One of my servers is a 2 gig pentium-M using the AOpen i915GMm-HFS. Rock
solid and stable with pretty good TV-output too.
lopaka
Anybody know of a desktop motherboard that will accept a Pentium-M
processor? I yanked a 3.06ghz Pentium-M from a dead Dell and would
like to use it in some sort of
Yes, sorry.
Greg Sevart wrote:
I think you mean Pentium 4-M...there are no P-M's at 3.06GHz.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Ruset
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:29 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Pe
Aopen makes one but its rather spendy
Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
-Original Message-
From: Ben Ruset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:29:23
To:hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Pentium-M desktop motherboard
Anybody know of a desktop motherboard that w
I think you mean Pentium 4-M...there are no P-M's at 3.06GHz.
Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Ruset
> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:29 PM
> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> Subject: [H] Pentium-M desktop motherb
Anybody know of a desktop motherboard that will accept a Pentium-M
processor? I yanked a 3.06ghz Pentium-M from a dead Dell and would like
to use it in some sort of desktop system.
So change the subnet on the master router to 255.255.252.0 but leave the IP
as 192.168.1.1 and then the secondary router will be 255.255.255.0 and
192.168.2.1?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of j maccraw
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9
Likely then what you need is 255.255.252.0 mask if the
slave is
192.168.2.1 & master 192.168.1.1.
If their same subnet, then you have a kludge by
ignoring some of the
network bits.
Gary VanderMolen wrote:
> In order to see both routers (and modem) config
screens,
> I had to set the subnet mas
Ha! End-losers never backup anyway, so no real
increased-risk there!
Hopefully as the content market evolves it will not be
such a hassle to
get copies of what you pay for, and those copies will
hopefully by then
not be so laden with DRM as to force you to download
them illicitly thus
making th
Considering many of the corps. I've deal with sent
their people out with
batteries that hold no charge there are extremes at
both ends where you
could still call it "functional".
By my own admission functionality was lost as I would
gamble (and had it
bite me a few times) rather than hassle wit
I guess that I just feel that a comprehensive backup solution should be
primarily for irreplaceable or original content--documents, home movies,
pictures, etc. IMO, redundancy (mirror or striping with parity) is a
sufficient level of protection for mass content that you speak of.
My biggest conce
In order to see both routers (and modem) config screens,
I had to set the subnet mask of the first router to 255.255.0.0.
Gary VanderMolen
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Klein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'The Hardware List'"
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 11:46 PM
Subject: FW: [H] t
Can you not recognize that you are the exception, not the norm? MOST users
do not need a spare battery or PSU. Even our salespeople, who do travel
frequently, do not have these extras...and they do just fine. Believe me, if
they requested them, they would get them.
You really make my point, though
I've been using laptop for slightly over two years with a single
battery, power adapter, and touchpad. I do a lot of work, and this
configuration has never let me down. Now I can imagine situations
where these additions would be a necessity, but they are very specific
and generally unusua
Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 04:50 PM 07/01/2007, j maccraw wrote:
Ok, I'll revisit this one last time. From experience,
these options are
necessities. Not in the sense that the laptop stops
functioning but in
the sense that it becomes hard to use the laptop in
both home & mobile
uses with majo
At 04:50 PM 07/01/2007, j maccraw wrote:
Ok, I'll revisit this one last time. From experience,
these options are
necessities. Not in the sense that the laptop stops
functioning but in
the sense that it becomes hard to use the laptop in
both home & mobile
uses with major hassles & money loss.
I'
Downloaded content like music & video comes to mind.
Backup will be #2
use for Blue-ray or HDDVD burners when the become
cheap enough.
Certainly not often or even in frequent 1 shot full
backup situation,
but needs some degree of backup none the less. If my
100GB+ of Mp3's
died I'd loose both t
Ok, I'll revisit this one last time. From experience,
these options are
necessities. Not in the sense that the laptop stops
functioning but in
the sense that it becomes hard to use the laptop in
both home & mobile
uses with major hassles & money loss.
Until I got a spare PSU I'd find myself eit
I tried to do something like this using three Linksys routers
WAN BEFSR41 = 192.168.1.x NOT wireless
LAN WRT54GS = 192.168.2.x wireless
WAP WRT546 = 192.168.3.x wireless
I wanted to isolate the wireless I make available to my tenant from
the LAN using the firewalls from all three router
And the pro has a 800 firewire, aluminum case, larger screen and better
speakers. I am happy with my MacBook though. It's smaller than a pro and has
all of the features I need, plus since it was so much cheaper I was able to max
the ram to 2 gig and get the accessories for less than 1500.
That's it.
Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
-Original Message-
From: "Brian Weeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:40:01
To:hwg
Subject: [H] Difference between MacBook and Pro?
Finally going to get one and trying to figure out where the
differences are. All
Finally going to get one and trying to figure out where the
differences are. All I can see so far is 2.0 vs 2.33 Core2 Duo and
and a double-layer SuperDrive. Anything else I am missing?
--
Brian
I would assume the firewall on the slaved router would
filter the IANA
subnet, but if it's getting IANA IP via DHCP though
it's WAN port from
LAN port of master router then you'd think it would
just work.
Say that 3 time fast!
Also, I'd put the GS on the border with DD-WRT before
I'd put the ol
More like "super-lame". They got $40 from me, not a
dime more, too many
problems with Talisman.
I've switched to DD-WRT and have had no headaches
since.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DD-WRT
http://www.dd-wrt.com/
JOEUSER wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Sunday, January 7, 2007, 12:16:45 AM, you wrote:
Hello Chris,
Sunday, January 7, 2007, 12:16:45 AM, you wrote:
> I have a WRT54G connected to my cable modem. It provides WPA2 Wireless G
> access to several devices in my apartment, along with a cat 5 connection to
> my main computer.
Something you may want to check into (super-charge your Link
Everything at this point is working fine, except I can't get to the
192.168.2.1 address. I guess it's not *that* big of a deal. I can create a
static route in the first router, however, nothing appears to work no matter
what I put in. I can't ping from the 192.168.1.1 router to the 192.168.2.1
r
Although they are called routers I suspect they are not proper routers so
the 1st device may not be able to route to a second internal subnet, even if
you have been able to configure it in some way.
Try giving the 2nd device an address like 192.168.1.100 and see what
happens.
Check the arp t
26 matches
Mail list logo
