DHSinclair wrote:
OK..inline below..
At 22:56 11/12/2007 -0800, you wrote:
Modem in bridge mode should not be doing anything
but
giving you a live IP
(internet rout able, not 192.168.x.x) on the WAN
port
of your router.
Define live IP. UMean a route-able IP transfers
through
We use the avocent kit here, 1 KVM per 2 cabinets. Remote control etc.
http://www.avocent.com/web/en.nsf/Content/solution-server
I am sure they are fairly expensive though.
Regards,
Jason Tozer
Database Analyst
London
Ext 1131 - 3SC.5
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IDE, slim optical drives are physically standard
enough. The mounting screw
holes are in the same spot, same connector, same
opening/depth dimensions, but
the tray bezels will vary and the mounts for those are
not universal. Not that I
would fret it since it's mostly cosmetic resulting in
a
Has anyone used a KVM switch that is controllable via TCP/IP? I have
a group of 14 computers that are currently controlled by three KVMs
(two 4 ports, and one 8 port.) I'd like to be able to control all
of them remotely via TCP/IP - but I want the local KVMs to still work
- I was thinking
Hello Jason,
Thursday, November 15, 2007, 8:20:38 AM, you wrote:
We use the avocent kit here, 1 KVM per 2 cabinets. Remote control etc.
http://www.avocent.com/web/en.nsf/Content/solution-server
I am sure they are fairly expensive though.
Avocent seconded.
--
Regards,
joeuser - Still
At 10:46 AM 15/11/2007, Hayes Elkins wrote:
Bah for KVM price gouging! With Dell DRACs (Dell Remote Access
Controller) and the HP equivalent working with standard cheap
ethernet switches, I never saw the point in buying into the KVMoIP
pricing scam. The new generation 9 Dell Poweredge racks
At 11:26 AM 15/11/2007, Joe User wrote:
Hello Thane,
Thursday, November 15, 2007, 9:04:29 AM, you wrote:
shrug Doesn't sound like it does anything for my situation though.
No, but I liked the way it pumped DELL!
I'm gonna go buy one right away!
LOL! Yeah, I know what you mean - maybe
Hello Thane,
Thursday, November 15, 2007, 9:04:29 AM, you wrote:
shrug Doesn't sound like it does anything for my situation though.
No, but I liked the way it pumped DELL!
I'm gonna go buy one right away!
lol
--
Regards,
joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...
Dell, HP, pretty much anybody big who sells servers these days. Date: Thu, 15
Nov 2007 09:26:29 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re[2]: [H] IP KVM switches Hello
Thane, Thursday, November 15, 2007, 9:04:29 AM, you wrote: shrug
Doesn't sound like it
Bah for KVM price gouging! With Dell DRACs (Dell Remote Access Controller) and
the HP equivalent working with standard cheap ethernet switches, I never saw
the point in buying into the KVMoIP pricing scam. The new generation 9 Dell
Poweredge racks dont even have keyboard and mouse ports
Hello Joe,
Thursday, November 15, 2007, 9:26:29 AM, you wrote:
Hello Thane,
Thursday, November 15, 2007, 9:04:29 AM, you wrote:
shrug Doesn't sound like it does anything for my situation though.
No, but I liked the way it pumped DELL!
I'm gonna go buy one right away!
lol
LOL sorry
We are using a Cyclades IP KVM. I like that the box itself is runing
linux, I don't like that the management interface requires Active X
Harry
Thane Sherrington wrote:
Has anyone used a KVM switch that is controllable via TCP/IP? I have
a group of 14 computers
Dell servers and dell desktops are two different things entirely. Date: Thu,
15 Nov 2007 09:40:51 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re[3]: [H] IP KVM switches Hello Joe,
Thursday, November 15, 2007, 9:26:29 AM, you wrote: Hello Thane,
Thursday,
Ditto. Avocent thirded!
Best,
Duncan
At 08:57 11/15/2007 -0600, JoeUser wrote:
snip
http://www.avocent.com/web/en.nsf/Content/solution-server
I am sure they are fairly expensive though.
Avocent seconded.
--
Regards,
joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...
Was reading the following article on how to reduce power in your home
office and came across this quote:
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9045738pageNumber=3
The Rocky Mountain Institute's Lovins suggests even more aggressive
settings. Since your
Regardless of how many times a HD is designed to spin down, it certainly
does not increase it's longevity and reliability to spin down more often.
It's somewhat similar to the suggestion to turn off you car engine every
time you come to a red light.
It may (or may not) save fuel, but it won't do
I think you're right - I think common sense suggests that turning
something on and off more often shortens its life. The problem with
the idea that it's designed for an enormous number of power cycles
is that every drive has it's own individual number that it's going to
die at, and that
Well I'll bet the 6x250GB RAID 5 array I have running here 24x7 is
probably sucking down significant juice. But then again my 19 CRT is
probably the worst culprit. I just am very adverse to motion blur and
don't like LCDs, although I will admit I haven't tried any in the last
year or two.
Been a while, have the procedure was just wondering if there is a program like
nLite for Windows for office ?
Just wondering.
fp
--
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Iron sharpens iron; scholar, the scholar.
FORC5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been a while, have the procedure was just wondering if there is a program
like nLite for Windows for office ?
Open Office? :)
A little humor because It's almost Friday.
regards,
al
seems MS in it's wisdom will not let me make a administrator install of my
version. First time ran into this. Has to be a enterprise version or something
like that.
hunt is on, must be a way. :-}
fp
At 04:31 PM 11/15/2007, Al Poked the stick with:
FORC5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been a while,
At 12:34 PM 11/15/2007, you wrote:
Well I'll bet the 6x250GB RAID 5 array I have running here 24x7 is
probably sucking down significant juice.
Here in Southern California my electric bill without AC is 3-400 per
month. I have an apartment size guest house / rental on the meter so
that means
I've always been told that a light takes less power to keep it on all of the
time than it does to turn it on off. It supposedly takes
alot more electricity to start up a light than just to leave it on. So I would
think the same applies to just about any other
electrical device, including
As a EE major, I doubt that is the case. However, for an incandescent
bulb the tremendous change in filament temperature between off and on
would cause earlier failure of the filament when cycled more often.
Gary VanderMolen [MS-MVP WLM]
--
I've
I saw an episode of mythbusters where they tested this, and they came
to the conclusion that it's definitely better to turn lightbulbs on
when you leave the room.
For the average lightbulbs they tested, slightly more energy was
consumed turning the bulb on--but it equalized out in like 3
What if there are some people who are too big for the holes in the sift?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 5:36 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] [A] moveing domain soon
Which will kill it very quickly.
Mark
Here's another thing, if you set the drive to power down after two
minutes of inactivity, it's going to spin up every time you get an
email, load a webpage, or save a document. I'll betting you access
your drive at least once every two-three minutes, so
That's why I like my 2-step process. Thumbdrive w/
encryption strong
passphrase contains keyfiles to mount all other
encrypted volumes. Loose the
thumbdrive, loose access to all encrypted data on
other drives because the huge,
random passphrases used to create them are not known
or written
Not that I think it is a good idea but if you are the NSA/FBI and
trying to track bad guys (however you define that) you have to admit
it is much harder these days. You can't just put a tap on someone's
phone line because of this darn thing called the Internet. The person
you want to track could
I assume you mean off when you leave a room?
Energy usage to power on seems obviously small vs.
leaving the light on all the
time. On the other hand, the light bulb will fail
sooner if being power cycled
vs. running constantly. This stress could be solved if
intelligent switches like
newer
Woops, I did indeed mean turn off -- my mistake.
I've heard the same thing about cell phone chargers etc (and TVs,
computers, game console, etc--anything with instant on or that
doesn't power off completely in its off state) though I enjoy the
term wall warts :)
I'd also read that in
31 matches
Mail list logo
