Well then all resources are localized per subnet, thus should not be an issue. This
assuming you have linked downstream routers via their WAN ports to LAN ports on the
upstream router and are relaxing downstream routers' firewall rules to allow traffic
in/out their WAN ports to the main SubnetA
Would issuing a route print on the affected machine reveal the result of this? I'm
assuming the 0.0.0.0 is catch-all route for non-VPN traffic.
On 4/25/2010 1:14 PM, Bino Gopal wrote:
Sounds like split tunneling being disabled on the one computer...could that
somehow be set on the VPN
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, maccrawj wrote:
Well 7z Zip have supplanted Rar as defacto standards for downloaded content
with Zip as usual the most common.
If it does Rar, Zip, adds better compressing 7z format, and incorporates all
the positives / none of the negatives you mention then one would
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, maccrawj wrote:
Would issuing a route print on the affected machine reveal the result of
this? I'm assuming the 0.0.0.0 is catch-all route for non-VPN traffic.
Not conclusively. VPN software generally hooks into the TCP stack and
depending on the setup may or may not
It seems very unlikely to be a server thing to me. If I connect to the VPN
on my main computer, it works just fine and everything on the LAN still
works. It's only my other computer that disappears from the LAN when it
connects to the VPN. So I've gotta figure that it is a local windows
config.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Brian Weeden wrote:
It seems very unlikely to be a server thing to me. If I connect to the VPN
on my main computer, it works just fine and everything on the LAN still
works. It's only my other computer that disappears from the LAN when it
connects to the VPN. So I've
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:47:56AM -0400, Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, maccrawj wrote:
Well 7z Zip have supplanted Rar as defacto standards for downloaded
content
with Zip as usual the most common.
If it does Rar, Zip, adds better compressing 7z format, and
No client - just a straight VPN setup through Windows to a commercial
service. And yes, same login info. I even deleted and re-created the VPN
connection using the same settings on both machines.
This just got even weirder - I rebooted the machine, and now it works fine.
I guess we just chalk
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Bryan Seitz wrote:
You mean zip files cuz that's what a jar is :)
I suppose.
A lot of the formats for 7z that winrar supports read and write are only
read on 7z. (According to the spec page I read on it).
Like what?!?
Unpacking only: ARJ, CAB, CHM, CPIO, DEB,
The Roshal brothers (creator/distributor of RAR) don't license out the RAR
algorithm AFAIK. They do provide a decompression-only library, which is why
7z and Winzip can open and extract RAR archives.
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
At 02:44 AM 4/26/2010, you wrote:
Well then all resources are localized per subnet, thus should not be
an issue. This assuming you have linked downstream routers via their
WAN ports to LAN ports on the upstream router
I am using the WAN ports to LAN ports,
and are relaxing downstream
On Monday 26 April 2010 15:14:56 Brian Weeden wrote:
I even deleted and re-created
the VPN connection using the same settings on both machines.
This just got even weirder - I rebooted the machine, and now it works
fine.
I guess we just chalk this up to a Windows feature.
On Monday 26 April 2010 18:26:55 Winterlight wrote:
At 02:44 AM 4/26/2010, you wrote:
Well then all resources are localized per subnet, thus should not be
an issue. This assuming you have linked downstream routers via their
WAN ports to LAN ports on the upstream router
I am using the WAN
Try making a request directly, say 64.233.169.93 and see what it
returns.
By this, if you mean manually inputting the DNS numbers then I did do
that on the TV but it didn't help
m
On Monday 26 April 2010 21:15:17 Winterlight wrote:
Try making a request directly, say 64.233.169.93 and see what it
returns.
By this, if you mean manually inputting the DNS numbers then I did do
that on the TV but it didn't help
m
What I was trying to find out was whether the machine
I open JAR files all the time with it, are you sure about that?
On 4/26/2010 1:47 AM, Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, maccrawj wrote:
Well 7z Zip have supplanted Rar as defacto standards for downloaded
content with Zip as usual the most common.
If it does Rar, Zip, adds better
Other than RAR I do not know of a format 7Z doesn't write and frankly making RAR,
Arj, Lzh, whatever files is not a real concern for me in this day age.
On 4/26/2010 1:47 AM, Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, maccrawj wrote:
Well 7z Zip have supplanted Rar as defacto standards
Back to SSD. What form factor do I need to be looking at here? I just
got my cooler master case and power supply. I need to open them up
tomorrow and have a look around. Microcenter has the i7 930 for 199
local so I am going to pick one of those up. I sort have been dragging
my feet with the SSD
Yeah basically Chris is Gay. :)
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 06:15:15PM -0700, maccrawj wrote:
Other than RAR I do not know of a format 7Z doesn't write and frankly making
RAR,
Arj, Lzh, whatever files is not a real concern for me in this day age.
On 4/26/2010 1:47 AM, Christopher Fisk wrote:
If he likes computer hardware I don't care if he's gay..
On 4/26/2010 8:47 PM, Bryan Seitz wrote:
Yeah basically Chris is Gay. :)
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 06:15:15PM -0700, maccrawj wrote:
Other than RAR I do not know of a format 7Z doesn't write and frankly making
RAR,
Arj, Lzh,
Wait, he's a harley rider?
Sent via BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Stan Zaske swza...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:57:32
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] 7-ZIP Question?
If he likes computer hardware I don't care if he's gay..
On 4/26/2010 8:47 PM, Bryan
I am still using Agent 3.0 and while I know how to use it I find it
slow, and cumbersome, especially when dealing with new groups and
lots of posts. Any recommendations for a Usenet reader. thanks
I have the Intel 80 gig (for my laptop) and the 160 gig (for my dual boot
desktop), and they both came with a 3.5 inch adapter, so it's not really an
issue. :)
...
On Apr 26, 2010, at 6:32 PM, GPL wrote:
Back to SSD. What form factor do I need to be looking at here? I just
got my cooler
That Kingston model has a new Toshiba controller and uses Toshiba NAND. It
might be fine, but after the number of failed Vertex drives I've had, I'm
sticking with something more enterprise and/or proven--which means Intel to
me.
-Original Message-
From:
24 matches
Mail list logo
