AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition Thuban 3.2GHz 6 x 512KB L2 Cache
6MB L3 Cache Socket AM3 125W Six-Core Desktop Processor
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103849nm_mc=EMC-IGNEFL042710cm_mmc=EMC-IGNEFL042710-_-EMC-042710-Index-_-ProcessorsDesktops-_-19103849-L0A
Wow...so I should be able to pop out my PII-X4-BE and put this baby
right in there, right?
On 4/27/2010 7:44 AM, Stan Zaske wrote:
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition Thuban 3.2GHz 6 x 512KB L2 Cache
6MB L3 Cache Socket AM3 125W Six-Core Desktop Processor
Check your mobo's web site for the latest BIOS release and see if it
supports the new CPU's. I need to do that myself this afternoon after
work. NewEgg also has the 2.8 GHz version for $100 less..
On 4/27/2010 6:50 AM, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
Wow...so I should be able to pop out my PII-X4-BE
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, maccrawj wrote:
I open JAR files all the time with it, are you sure about that?
Only going by what the webpage says. If the webpage's documentation is
not up to date how am I to know?
Christopher Fisk
--
Lisa: Dad, I think that's pretty spurious.
Homer: Well,
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, tmse...@rlrnews.com wrote:
Wait, he's a harley rider?
Wish!
Christopher Fisk
--
You can present the material, but you can't make me care.
-- Calvin
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Winterlight wrote:
I am still using Agent 3.0 and while I know how to use it I find it slow, and
cumbersome, especially when dealing with new groups and lots of posts. Any
recommendations for a Usenet reader. thanks
I've used a bunch, but I really like newsleacher.
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Winterlight wrote:
I am still using Agent 3.0 and while I know how to use it I find it slow,
and cumbersome, especially when dealing with new groups and lots of posts.
Any recommendations for a Usenet reader. thanks
I've
I had the same issue it was down to all 10. Addresses being routed down the
VPN. I changed my home network to 192.168.. and now everything works fine,
Gary Hunter
Consulting Engineer
Travelport GDS
T: (+1) 303 - 397 - 5035
M:(+1) 720 - 231 - 0965
E: gary.hun...@travelport.com
SITA: HDQOK1G
That doesn't make any sense - 10. addresses cannot be routed via VPN, same
as 192. Both of those address ranges are explicitly defined as private and
cannot be routed on the Internet. The minute any packet with a 10. or 192.
or any other private range hits an internet router it gets dropped.
I
They (RC1918 addresses) absolutely can be routed over a VPN. The whole idea
is to encapsulate and encrypt packets--the internet routers never see the
RFC1918 addresses.
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of
Sorry, you're right. I use this VPN for my WAN traffic so that's what I was
thinking of, but of course you can also use a VPN to connect two LANs as
well.
---
Brian Weeden
Technical Advisor
Secure World Foundation http://www.secureworldfoundation.org
+1 (514) 466-2756
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Greg Sevart wrote:
They (RC1918 addresses) absolutely can be routed over a VPN. The whole idea
is to encapsulate and encrypt packets--the internet routers never see the
RFC1918 addresses.
Hell, there is nothing keeping them from being routed across the internet
as a
That's not the same. Your router us doing NAT and translating your
private IP address to a public one.
---
Brian
Sent from my iPhone
On 2010-04-27, at 4:16 PM, Christopher Fisk chr...@mhonline.net wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Greg Sevart wrote:
They (RC1918 addresses) absolutely
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Brian Weeden wrote:
That's not the same. Your router us doing NAT and translating your private IP
address to a public one.
Not really.
It doesn't break RFC because road runner doesn't route any of those IP's
outside their network, it is all internal for their
Right, but those addresses still only work on RoadRunner's private
network, not the public Internet.
At some point your private address need to get translated to a public
one, unless the only destinations you communicate with are within the
private network.
And I for one really dislike
Err lol, I guess you forgot the actual MAIN use case of a VPN which is as a
virtual PRIVATE network to connect your private home network to another one,
like work-which is exactly what all the VPNs we use at work for do! :P
In which case it is most explicitly to route RFC1918 addresses over
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Brian Weeden wrote:
Right, but those addresses still only work on RoadRunner's private network,
not the public Internet.
Road Runner's private network is a part of my public internet. It goes
over the same wires.
At some point your private address need to get
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Winterlight wrote:
Do you subscribe to their search service? is it worth doing?
I'm not sure how worth it it is. I don't subscribe.
I paid for a 1 year plan which expired and I'm just using the latest
version that was available when my subscription expired.
Err, honestly you are explaining it rather poorly! (Now, not to pick a fight,
but just to clarify any confusion for folks who aren't clear trying to follow
the discussion):
Earlier you said: Hell, there is nothing keeping them from being routed across
the internet as a whole. Road Runner
NewsbinPro user for several years now, very good product goor price especially if
you do Giganews' deal. Incorporates compression to maximize throughput on headers, I
get ~70Mb on a 9Mb connection for headers.
If you're not downloading binaries, then it's not the reader for you though.
On
LOL!
On 4/26/2010 6:47 PM, Bryan Seitz wrote:
Yeah basically Chris is Gay. :)
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 06:15:15PM -0700, maccrawj wrote:
Other than RAR I do not know of a format 7Z doesn't write and frankly making
RAR,
Arj, Lzh, whatever files is not a real concern for me in this day age.
21 matches
Mail list logo
