only way the two networks can talk to each
other is via the internet.
--
Best Regards:
Gaffer
Pontefract Linux User Group.
isolated networks.
> At 12:53 PM 5/4/2013, you wrote:
> >That depends upon whether you use your machine as a router or not !
> > I have a system where I have three network cards and two internal
> > networks attached.
--
Best Regards:
Gaffer
Pontefract Linux User Group.
d NICs? Is there a great use for the extra NIC that I
> am unaware of? Has someone found a creative way to employ two NICs or
> is this just another dead feature that hasn't fallen to wayside as of
> yet?
--
Best Regards:
Gaffer
Pontefract Linux User Group.
the above clears the problem fine, but I would be inclined to
test the memory by putting it into another machine to check it.
Either way run "Memtest" or similar if you can.
--
Best Regards:
Gaffer
Pontefract Linux User Group.
refresh the code.
--
Best Regards:
Gaffer
Pontefract Linux User Group.
nux disk dupe, I don't know if there is a Wins version.
--
Best Regards:
Gaffer
Pontefract Linux User Group.
ou point to point coverage as well as increasing signal
strength. The major loss is in the co-axial feed to the antenna so
idealy the TX/RX wants to be as close as practicable.
--
Best Regards:
Gaffer
Pontefract Linux User Group.
ine Below ***
> **Tallyho**
> **
> To cure insomnia, get lots of sleep.
> ******
--
Best Regards:
Gaffer
Pontefract Linux User Group.
On Friday 08 October 2010 19:59:12 Soren wrote:
> Booting from a normally usable floppy on CD (floppy disk emulation),
> it only generates this exact error message:
>
> "Type the name of the command interpreter (e.g.,
> C:\WINDOWS.COMMAND.COM) A>"
Basically that error message is saying "I can't fi
oes it
> > matter where you buy the display.
> >
> >At 03:16 PM 9/18/2010, you wrote:
> > > And do like I do: Take plenty of pictures while you're
> > > disassembling...
> > >
> > >On 9/18/2010 9:42 AM, Gaffer wrote:
> > >>On Friday 17 S
On Sunday 19 September 2010 06:43:49 David L. Gabler wrote:
> At 10:13 PM 9/18/2010, you wrote:
> >Just curious...what is the charge to replace a LCD screen? HP wants
> > 375 for a new display and that makes it prohibitive for a laptop
> > that was 800 14-18 months ago even if I do it.. or is d
; At 03:16 PM 9/18/2010, you wrote:
> > And do like I do: Take plenty of pictures while you're
> > disassembling...
> >
> >On 9/18/2010 9:42 AM, Gaffer wrote:
> >>On Friday 17 September 2010 04:27:10 Winterlight wrote:
> >>>Today, somebody gave me
On Friday 17 September 2010 04:27:10 Winterlight wrote:
> Today, somebody gave me their old laptop. Actually, it is not
> very old at all, it was purchased new in 09 a little over a year
> ago. It is a HPG70-463CL which is laptop with a 17 inch screen
> designed to be parked. The had it on the f
Hi Duncan,
On Thursday 08 July 2010 17:19:08 DSinc wrote:
> Does anyone have links to vendors that handle NOS stuff?
>
> It seems that my old (12-15yrs) keyboards are finally beginning to go
> south. I would like to buy 6 spares, but I am kinda picky:
> o- need PS/2 interface for my KVMs,
> o- rea
Hi Duncan,
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 21:23:39 DSinc wrote:
> Gaffer (Josh),
> My apologies. I somehow forgot that my traffic (queries) go to many
> places around our globe. It was not until our 1st exchange that I
> realized that you were sharing from a UK TELCO system I do not ha
nothing to do with NAT.
>
> and
>
> >You can't have it both ways ! If you have the router firewall
> >switched on and NAT switched on its not in "Bridge Mode"'
>
> On 6/29/2010 12:14 PM, Gaffer wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > On Tuesday
Hi Josh,
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 08:00:18 Josh MacCraw wrote:
> Uh Gaffer needs to read & process the info better! The only "bridge
> mode" here is on the *DSL MODEM* which is where the *ROUTER* sends
> the PPOE credentials (if even needed) instead of the modem resultin
Hi Duncan,
On Monday 28 June 2010 21:50:10 DSinc wrote:
> Gaffer,
> My replies are inline
> TNX, anyway.
>
> On 06/28/2010 15:45, Gaffer wrote:
> > On Monday 28 June 2010 18:54:39 DSinc wrote:
> >> I still use xDSL. Soon I will move to FIOS. Well, as I
On Monday 28 June 2010 18:54:39 DSinc wrote:
> I still use xDSL. Soon I will move to FIOS. Well, as I get smarter
> and answer my ?many? questions (another thread in play!)
>
> I am beginning (again) to have trouble with my xDSL connection. I
> suspect someone local (or ?) keeps camping out on my a
Hi Duncan,
On Sunday 20 June 2010 03:30:58 DSinc wrote:
> On 06/19/2010 16:28, Gaffer wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 June 2010 20:38:39 DSinc wrote:
> >> OS: Win2000 Server
> >> WinUpdate patches: 06-11-10
> >> Browser: FF 3.6.3 (and I suspect IE6sp1)
> >&
On Saturday 19 June 2010 20:38:39 DSinc wrote:
> OS: Win2000 Server
> WinUpdate patches: 06-11-10
> Browser: FF 3.6.3 (and I suspect IE6sp1)
>
> So, I've had this icon on my desktop for years that opens/calls my
> NAS. Like: "http://10.0.0.x/";.
> It does not work.
>
> If I use the FF browser,
On Thursday 03 June 2010 04:11:18 David L Gabler wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bobby Heid"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 8:15 PM
> Subject: [H] Win XP stop error D1
>
> > Hey,
> >
> >
> >
> > A neighbor's pc (Gateway 500SE) was showing SMART errors so I
> > suggested tha
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 02:51:15 Winterlight wrote:
> Not if you go at it from another OS, which is why I like to dual
> boot. Sometimes they don't delete because they aren't really there.
If can be copied, then its real.
NTFS can display ghost files, though they often disappear after a
reboot.
On Saturday 22 May 2010 03:24:27 DSinc wrote:
> Scoobydo,
> If I dig in by bone pile I could offer you a brand new
> and only use once, spare for your current P2-333. I bought mine
> because it had some special S-Spec #. If interested, I can share
> critical numbers.
I've just binned around 400+
On Friday 21 May 2010 22:59:23 Scoobydo wrote:
> If you've had experience of several bad CPU's then you must be a
> system builder with hundreds of builds under your belt. I'm just a
> hobbyist and have only built 20 or so boxes over the years and I've
> never even heard of anyone having a CPU go b
On Friday 21 May 2010 15:02:35 Scoobydo wrote:
> I assume you've looked for a borked BIOS setting? Doesn't make sense
> the CPU is bad. I've never heard of one going bad so must assume
> something else is happening..
>
>
> On Fri, 21 May 2010 06:24:39 -0500, Thane Sherrington
>
> wrote:
> > I have
On Thursday 13 May 2010 00:24:52 DSinc wrote:
> Is it fair for me to NOW believe that the majority of this LIST is
> now actively using WIFI for their internal home LANs?
>
> No. I do not wish to start a firestorm with those that use both!
> The basic question is about the use of WIFI... :)
>
>
On Thursday 13 May 2010 13:41:34 Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
> Ok...then this makes perfect sense. I guess I got confused as before
> I had 1 Gbps adapters on the PCs, but a router with a 10/100 Mbps
> switch. Everything was bottlenecked to the router's speed. But now
> the router is jacked!
Start a
On Saturday 08 May 2010 18:23:39 Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
> I'm using a linksys wrt54g with a wsb24 booster.
>
> My mothers claim to do 1000 Mbps yet on file transfers I only get
> like 11 MB/s which is more like 100Mpbs/8 = 12.5 MB/s. If my wired
> network is running at 1000 Mbps shouldn't I bet
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 22:21:22 maccrawj wrote:
> Gaffer was talking about a destination IP not the gateway, IP, & DNS
> values. If the WD has ability to access local media shares by IP then
> that would fit the test Gaffer means (I think).
Yes ! If he can access by IP but not
On Monday 26 April 2010 21:15:17 Winterlight wrote:
> >Try making a request directly, say "64.233.169.93" and see what it
> >returns.
>
> By this, if you mean manually inputting the DNS numbers then I did do
> that on the TV but it didn't help
>
> m
What I was trying to find out was whether the
On Monday 26 April 2010 18:26:55 Winterlight wrote:
> At 02:44 AM 4/26/2010, you wrote:
> >Well then all resources are localized per subnet, thus should not be
> >an issue. This assuming you have linked downstream routers via their
> >WAN ports to LAN ports on the upstream router
>
> I am using the
On Monday 26 April 2010 15:14:56 Brian Weeden wrote:
> I even deleted and re-created
> the VPN connection using the same settings on both machines.
>
> This just got even weirder - I rebooted the machine, and now it works
> fine.
>
> I guess we just chalk this up to a Windows "feature".
>
> ---
On Sunday 25 April 2010 07:05:52 maccrawj wrote:
> Spam? Virus? Seems like an odd post!
>
> On 4/24/2010 7:05 PM, al wrote:
> > http://gedebeq.tripod.com/
Viagra, Sex Pills, Spam + Avoid like the plague ! Someone has had
his Email A/C compromised.
--
Best Regards:
Derrick.
On Sunday 25 April 2010 08:31:16 John R Steinbruner wrote:
> What about that 3 switch or 3 hub limit for an Ethernet connection?
What switch limit ?
--
Best Regards:
Derrick.
Running Open SuSE 11.1 KDE 3.5.10 Desktop.
Pontefract Linux Users Group.
On Friday 23 April 2010 23:33:50 Winterlight wrote:
> OK, now I have replaced that router = Linksys WG54 with another
> Linksys WG54 that I updated the firmware on and checked it out as
> working well. Then I set it up for my Network = DHCP at defaults
> 192.168.1.1, disabled wireless completely, g
Hi Jim,
On Thursday 08 April 2010 21:22:01 James Maki wrote:
> I was worried about that potential, so I moved the motherboard back
> to the original case. Hooked up the power supply and switch and still
> did not boot. I added back the fans and found that it will only boot
> if 1 fan in each bank
Hi Jim,
On Thursday 08 April 2010 21:23:27 James Maki wrote:
> Reconnected to the original power supply with the same results -- the
> system will not boot. Found out it is a failsafe for the fans not
> being connected.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim
Glad you found the problem. I had visions of the same tr
Replying to myself...
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 19:59:06 Gaffer wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 April 2010 03:41:50 gibney wrote:
> > I'd still like to hear if anyone runs across such a thing in a 5
> > 1/4 :)
>
> Certainly not commercially. I've never seen one.
>
Hi James,
On Thursday 08 April 2010 04:22:41 James Maki wrote:
> I purchased a refurbished HP Blade server, Proliant DL140 with dual
> 3.06 GHz Xeon CPUs. It worked just fine and I was able to install
> Windows Server 2008. I had a slim format HP laptop DVD I was going to
> utilize, but the interf
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 09:21:43 gibney wrote:
> I know. I've been hanging on to parts until someday, I'll try to
> network the an old box with 5 1/4 and recover my dad's files from old
> disks. I was hopeful when this thread popped up.
Most if not all machines that support a 3.5" floppy driv
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 03:41:50 gibney wrote:
> I'd still like to hear if anyone runs across such a thing in a 5
> 1/4 :)
Certainly not commercially. I've never seen one.
Hacking the wiring is quite easy. A five minute job !
Whether or not the USB interface recognises the drive as a
1.2
On Sunday 21 March 2010 19:29:18 Michael Resnick wrote:
> It doesn't bother me that XP identifies the monitor as Default
> Monitor. What I'm trying to do is stretch my screen image to fill the
> monitor and I'm missing the rightmost inch.
>
> Thanks again,
> Mike Resnick
What you are describing i
43 matches
Mail list logo
