[H] Asus bad

2007-10-29 Thread FORC5
Sent back a MB with a blown cap on rma. mb was not giving me any grief. They sent back a different one with the same cap puffed. May have to find another default MB vendor. :'( Be on the phone in the AM to do this again. fp -- Tallyho ! ]:8) Taglines below ! -- I have lost my mind, but it mus

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-29 Thread DHSinclair
Everyone is having trouble with caps lately. I suspected this back when the List started seeing it. I planned 4-6yrs for the inventory to process. Guess we are still seeing stuff with bad caps...$$$ talks! Maybe another few years? Best, Duncan At 17:41 10/29/2007 -0700, you wrote: Sent back

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-30 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 09:41 PM 29/10/2007, FORC5 wrote: Sent back a MB with a blown cap on rma. mb was not giving me any grief. They sent back a different one with the same cap puffed. May have to find another default MB vendor. :'( What motherboard model and how old was it? (I've had the same problem with Dell

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-30 Thread FORC5
K8N-E deluxe. I would of though new enough for this problem to be gone. Hard to believe there are still sub par caps ( if that even was the problem and not the excuse ) still in inventory. Had same bug with a7n8x's also. This particular cap is not near the cpu and is just puffed, not leaking or

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-30 Thread Joe User
Hello FORC5, Monday, October 29, 2007, 6:41:36 PM, you wrote: > Sent back a MB with a blown cap on rma. mb was not giving me any > grief. They sent back a different one > with the same cap puffed. > May have to find another default MB vendor. :'( > Be on the phone in the AM to do this again. >

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-30 Thread Rick Glazier
FWIW: Me too... (But bought used for a repair...) GIGABYTE GA-7ZXE SOCKET A 462 MOTHERBOARD ATHLON http://preview.tinyurl.com/2g4ey9 Fixed it myself. Rick Glazier At 09:41 PM 29/10/2007, FORC5 wrote: Sent back a MB with a blown cap on rma. mb was not giving m

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-30 Thread FORC5
I have done a few myself, but this one is under warranty. I actually have a socket A on the bench for repair ( 3 bad caps ) but wonder if it is worth it, NOT. mine is a 820uF 6.3v. I wonder if a 1000uF 6.3v would be better or maybe one same uF and higher V. in the mail today. I remember my fr

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-30 Thread FORC5
bought this brand new, was not puffed. Just got another RMA. Meanwhile here I sit broken hearted >:-} I should put Asus in my speed dial fp At 07:09 AM 10/30/2007, Joe User Poked the stick with: >Hello FORC5, > >Monday, October 29, 2007, 6:41:36 PM, you wrote: > >> Sent back a MB with a blown ca

RE: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-30 Thread Tim "The Beave" Lider
: Joe User; The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] Asus bad bought this brand new, was not puffed. Just got another RMA. Meanwhile here I sit broken hearted >:-} I should put Asus in my speed dial fp At 07:09 AM 10/30/2007, Joe User Poked the stick with: >Hello FORC5, > >Monday, October 29,

RE: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 02:57 PM 30/10/2007, Tim \"The Beave\" Lider wrote: All these Caps being damaged messages reminds to let you guys know that you can drastically reduce the problem by actually buying high end Power Supplies. If you spent $50.00 or less on a power supply, well may I say you get what you paid fo

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
Thane Sherrington wrote: At 02:57 PM 30/10/2007, Tim \"The Beave\" Lider wrote: All these Caps being damaged messages reminds to let you guys know that you can drastically reduce the problem by actually buying high end Power Supplies. If you spent $50.00 or less on a power supply, well may I

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 11:09 AM 31/10/2007, Anthony Q. Martin wrote: How much time did this take you in total? It seem to me that the problem is cheap, cheap, cheap all the way around. I'd say a little under an hour and a half of labour. The whole thing cost the customer $93. I charge by the job, not by the ho

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Rick Glazier
I am doing something "similar" with an old Soyo(/AMD/VIA) MB of my own... I managed to find a NEW exact rev. sealed board from a dealer... I think I'm good to go for another three years... And all for only $40(US)... Lots of RAM, and runs at 2.6G AMD... I'm beginning to think it was a bad idea t

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 05:03 PM 31/10/2007, Rick Glazier wrote: I am doing something "similar" with an old Soyo(/AMD/VIA) MB of my own... I managed to find a NEW exact rev. sealed board from a dealer... I think I'm good to go for another three years... And all for only $40(US)... Lots of RAM, and runs at 2.6G AMD.

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Rick Glazier
Actually, the remark about AMD/VIA and Soyo stems from the fact they don't last over 3.75 years. You can squeeze them a little longer, but two of mine went pretty "belly up", and my wifes was VERY sensitive to moderate heat this summer... The minute the temp dropped a couple degrees it worked fin

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread DHSinclair
Thanks, Thane. And why I passed on the whole P4 scene...back when?.. Best, Duncan At 16:34 10/31/2007 -0300, Thane wrote: snip Because of the puffed caps problem? Intel-based motherboard have had plenty of those. The P4 doubles as a cap-puffer due to the ridiculous power strain it puts on co

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread DHSinclair
Rick, Agree totally even w/o any technical specifics. Every AMD/VIA m/b I have ever used has been a problem, or, suffered what I perceive to be an early RTF. Maybe, just my situation, but still.. Best, Duncan At 16:11 10/31/2007 -0500, you wrote: Actually, the remark about AMD/VIA and Soyo

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Robert Martin Jr.
I've definitely had issues with a few VIA based mainboards, BUT I also have 3 epia mini-itx systems that have been rock solid running 24/7 for about 4 years. The mini-itx ones seem to be very stable when configured as these ones are. I used the same drive image for all of them, running win2k ser

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread FORC5
more VIA then AMD IMO I shy from VIA anymore. At 02:15 PM 10/31/2007, DHSinclair Poked the stick with: >Rick, >Agree totally even w/o any technical specifics. Every AMD/VIA m/b I have >ever used has been a problem, or, suffered what I perceive to be an early RTF. >Maybe, just my situation, but st

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread DHSinclair
Good choice IMHO. To me, VIA means "an experience." Best, Duncan At 16:28 10/31/2007 -0700, you wrote: more VIA then AMD IMO I shy from VIA anymore. At 02:15 PM 10/31/2007, DHSinclair Poked the stick with: >Rick, >Agree totally even w/o any technical specifics. Every AMD/VIA m/b I have >ever us

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-11-01 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 06:11 PM 31/10/2007, Rick Glazier wrote: Actually, the remark about AMD/VIA and Soyo stems from the fact they don't last over 3.75 years. You can squeeze them a little longer, but two of mine went pretty "belly up", and my wifes was VERY sensitive to moderate heat this summer... The minute th

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-11-01 Thread Rick Glazier
It pretty much helped form/(cement?) my opinion when Soyo went out of the MB business... The good news is -- they still support the stuff on the WEB, so I can't complain (too much...) Rick Glazier From: "Thane Sherrington" Interesting. I've seen a lot of VI

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-11-01 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 11:06 AM 01/11/2007, Rick Glazier wrote: It pretty much helped form/(cement?) my opinion when Soyo went out of the MB business... heh heh. Good point. The good news is -- they still support the stuff on the WEB, so I can't complain (too much...) That's pretty big of them - a lot of m