Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-08 Thread Brian Weeden
> They make a product that they refer to as NZFS, I'm using flexraid-f, which >> also uses that algorithm. I simulated a drive fail last night. Flawless >> recovery. Nice. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: "Alex Lee" >> Sent: âEURZ(7/

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-08 Thread DSinc
imulated a drive fail last night. Flawless recovery. Nice. -Original Message- From: "Alex Lee" Sent: âEURZ(7/âEURZ(7/âEURZ(2013 8:40 PM To: "hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com" Subject: Re: [H] Nas 3.0 flexraid is zfs-based? On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Chris Ree

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-08 Thread Bryan Seitz
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:29:36 -0400, Chris Reeves wrote: Flexraid.com Seems sorta like ghetto-raid, ie S3 type object replication. Decent idea though given you can have replicates and if you have a 'lose 1 drive past a raid level' type scenario, you really only lose what was lost physic

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-08 Thread Chris Reeves
ts.hardwaregroup.com" Subject: Re: [H] Nas 3.0 flexraid is zfs-based? On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Chris Reeves wrote: > I ended up going with flexraid. So far, very happy with it. 18tb avail in > one array and 26tb in the other. All good so far. > > -Original Message- &g

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-07 Thread Alex Lee
Sent: 7/7/2013 6:45 PM > To: "hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com" > Subject: Re: [H] Nas 3.0 > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:14:00AM -0700, Tim Lider wrote: > > I have not done a project like that . When I price out a NAS project it > is > > actually less expensive (when

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-07 Thread Chris Reeves
I ended up going with flexraid. So far, very happy with it. 18tb avail in one array and 26tb in the other. All good so far. -Original Message- From: "Bryan Seitz" Sent: ‎7/‎7/‎2013 6:45 PM To: "hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com" Subject: Re: [H] Nas 3.0 On Fri, J

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-07 Thread Bryan Seitz
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:14:00AM -0700, Tim Lider wrote: > I have not done a project like that . When I price out a NAS project it is > actually less expensive (when you think of equipment and time) to get one > premade. The NAS' we use are WD's right now. The boss also does not like to > have >

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-05 Thread Tim Lider
I have not done a project like that . When I price out a NAS project it is actually less expensive (when you think of equipment and time) to get one premade. The NAS' we use are WD's right now. The boss also does not like to have the TB size of the NAS' too large, I limit the size to around 8TB to

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-04 Thread Chris Reeves
7;m moving over about 4-5tb for nas4free to run under esxi. -Original Message- From: "Julian Zottl" Sent: ‎7/‎4/‎2013 4:12 PM To: "hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com" Subject: Re: [H] Nas 3.0 Take a look at Nexenta and FreeNAS too! Julian Sent from my iProduct, cau

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-04 Thread Julian Zottl
Take a look at Nexenta and FreeNAS too! Julian Sent from my iProduct, cause I'm iSpecial But not in that ishort bus kind of way... On Jul 4, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Chris Reeves wrote: > Tim- > > I'm weighing redoing my home NAS I'm thinking about either going with > FlexRAID or Storage Spac

[H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-04 Thread Chris Reeves
Tim- I'm weighing redoing my home NAS I'm thinking about either going with FlexRAID or Storage Spaces. Right now it would be two pools, about 30tb each. I'm just going to demote the old whs and convert it to NAS4free and make it a backup target. I'm somewhat drawn to Flexraids logic of if