No Marantz Gold series tube type from the seventies, that is the best.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Ruset
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 8:11 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] OT - Proof that audiophiles are idiots
Is it April first or what
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hayes Elkins
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 10:17 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] OT - Proof that audiophiles are idiots- the $500Ethernet
cable
Review from
rdwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] OT - Proof that audiophiles are idiots- the $500Ethernet cable
Yeah, but the types of people who are buying $500 cables are not the
types that will typically buy Denon gear. They're more in Marantz,
Rotel, NAD, etc. territory. (And even Marantz is pretty low brow
t; Subject: Re: [H] OT - Proof that audiophiles are idiots- the $500Ethernet
> cable
>
> Yeah, but the types of people who are buying $500 cables are not the
> types that will typically buy Denon gear. They're more in Marantz,
> Rotel, NAD, etc. territory. (And even Marantz is
Yeah, but the types of people who are buying $500 cables are not the
types that will typically buy Denon gear. They're more in Marantz,
Rotel, NAD, etc. territory. (And even Marantz is pretty low brow in the
audiophile world.)
Working quite well is another story. I know people with HTIAB syste
maybe you've never used the Denon POA-3000-5000 series Class A amps.
Or their mono-blocs. Have a POA-3000 that works quite well. Different
strokes perhaps.
Duncan
At 22:21 06/13/2008 -0400, you wrote:
Nobody has mentioned that audiophiles are not likely to be running Denon
gear in the first pl
udiophile cable for a
> lowbrow receiver? Bah!
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:21:54 -0400
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> > Subject: Re: [H] OT - Proof that audiophiles are idiots- the $500Ethernet
> cable
> >
> &g
Actually that's the first thing I hinted at - a audiophile cable for a lowbrow
receiver? Bah!
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:21:54 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> Subject: Re: [H] OT - Proof that audiophiles are idiots- the $500Ethernet
>
1:21:03 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> Subject: Re: [H] OT - Proof that audiophiles are idiots- the $500Ethernet
> cable
>
> You guys don't know what you're talking about. Have you even tried this cable
> or are you just believing what
Nobody has mentioned that audiophiles are not likely to be running Denon
gear in the first place.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Hayes Elkins
> Sent: Fri 6/13/2008 4:03 PM
> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> Subject: Re: [H] OT - Proof that audiophiles are idiots- the $500Ethernet
> cable
>
>
>
>
> It's a "proprietary interconnect", meaning they t
le cable.
You guys are so lame.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Hayes Elkins
Sent: Fri 6/13/2008 4:03 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] OT - Proof that audiophiles are idiots- the $500Ethernet cable
It's a "proprietary interco
12 matches
Mail list logo
