Re: [H] Dot-NET question

2008-03-23 Thread Joe User
Hello Bobby, Saturday, March 22, 2008, 9:54:20 AM, you wrote: Wow, my message took about 12 hours to post! I sent it at 8:25 last night and got this one at 6:32 this morning. Yeah, I noticed a tad bit O lag also. -- Regards, joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...

Re: [H] Dot-NET question

2008-03-22 Thread steinie
Yep, it's OK to use I believe they started the dot Net stuff when they were told to cease and desist the MS Java engine they used to make... Thane Sherrington wrote: At 06:43 PM 21/03/2008, DHSinclair wrote: Just WHAT is this MS Dot-NET 2.0 software? I do not use it, and now, Intuit

Re: [H] Dot-NET question

2008-03-22 Thread DHSinclair
Steinie, Brian, Thane, Bobby, Thanks for the crisp answers. dot-net makes perfect sense now. Remember the VB and Java business of old. I installed it yesterday on another machine to peek/poke. Not much to see. Will install here today and get on with business. Thank you so much, Duncan At

Re: [H] Dot-NET question

2008-03-21 Thread Brian Weeden
Its needed because a part (or all of) the program was written using the .net language. Sort of like why you need JVM to run java apps. Look up .net on wikipedia for more details on what makes .net an increasingly popular programming language. --- Brian Weeden Technical Consultant

Re: [H] dot-net question

2007-04-06 Thread DHSinclair
Thane, I do understand your example, and do recall the need for latest VB runtimes on several occasions. But this was way back in the early 90's w/OSR2 and Win98se. But, I never dabbled in VB actively much. Used it mostly for background ops that required it IIRC mostly MSOffice apps. and

Re: [H] dot-net question

2007-04-06 Thread Rick Glazier
I advance searched (Googled): .net required and got 228,000,000 hits... I'm thinking it is gaining traction... grin A sample one is here. http://www.threetwists.com/support/dotnetfx.htm They explain it fairly well... Disclaimer: I never heard of them before and did not bother to

Re: [H] dot-net question

2007-04-06 Thread Rick Glazier
That is how I knew their detector tool only looked for the one... You are right also in that the detector tool is next to useless, but easy for beginers... Rick Glazier From: Wayne Johnson If .NET is installed on your system then it should be listed in

[H] dot-net question

2007-04-05 Thread DHSinclair
Is there a website (other than M$) that can explain the dot-net business for a non-programmer? I have never used anything dot-net that I am aware of, but still recall many negative comments about most things dot-net. Perhaps time for more study of the subject. Thanks, Duncan This email scanned

Re: [H] dot-net question

2007-04-05 Thread G.Waleed Kavalec
There are many, many dot-net oriented yahoo and google groups. Join a few and let the message traffic flow by, you will pick up a lot. If you want the standing-on-one-foot answer, .Net is all about the creation of a layer that holds the most common functions and services needed by any

Re: [H] dot-net question

2007-04-05 Thread Rick Glazier
Would it be too much of a stretch to say it was the new MS answer to JRE (JavaVM) after they (effectively) got kicked out of that? (Sorry if I got the wrong idea somewhere...) Rick Glazier From: G.Waleed Kavalec clipped: .Net is all about the

Re: [H] dot-net question

2007-04-05 Thread G.Waleed Kavalec
Take a mix of the Java VM and the old VB runtimes, add some steroids and mass quantities of man-hours, stir, simmer... No you aren't wrong, it's just not the whole story. My impression is that MS did with CLR for developers what they did with the Windows interface for end-usres; taking lots and