Why not just log the % of idle time usage or something
like that?
Most of the snappiness of cleaned or freshly installed
windows is lack of extra
processes & no fragmentation which quickly fades after
install software that
adds support DLL's or processes.
Thane Sherrington wrote:
> At 12:17 PM
At 12:17 PM 11/07/2007, Greg Sevart wrote:
I don't know that any true benchmark software is going to provide
significantly valid results. A good deal of the "slowness" users report is
as a result of concurrent software (legitimate and spy/adware) running in
the background. Your standard benchmark
I don't know that any true benchmark software is going to provide
significantly valid results. A good deal of the "slowness" users report is
as a result of concurrent software (legitimate and spy/adware) running in
the background. Your standard benchmark application will run its battery of
tests at
At 10:33 AM 11/07/2007, Hayes Elkins wrote:
When you say "simple" do you really mean quick?
I was gonna say PC Mark, free version, is pretty comprehensive, easy
to use - but takes a while.
The faster the better, but I'd also like to get a reproducible
result. How long is PC Mark going to ta
When you say "simple" do you really mean quick?
I was gonna say PC Mark, free version, is pretty comprehensive, easy to use
- but takes a while.
From: Thane Sherrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Hardware List
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Simple Windows benchmark softw
