Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Leo,
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 05:38 -0800, Leo Simons wrote:
I keep getting lost in the licensing discussions. I *think* the below accurately
represents where we are right now.
Thanks for writing this down. I'll try to clarify some things below.
There is one nitpick
As promised, here are the proposed changes to our Bulk Contributor
Questionnaire. The purpose here is to enable contributions for which
ACQs are not available for all authors of the contribution. This
could be for many legitimate reasons, and we should do everything to
liberalize our cont
On Nov 12, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Tim,
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 16:56 +, Tim Ellison wrote:
I agree that getting a resolution to the community/licensing
differences
would be fantastic. I don't see that happening quickly, and I don't
want to see the success or failure
On Nov 12, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Geir,
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 11:56 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 11:24 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We have to address this. We started a while ago and it didn't go
well
Could you give a summary of the discussion
Hi Tim,
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 23:32 +, Tim Ellison wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > I believe people are really reluctant to hack on the [new] code
> > while there is a legal limbo whether it can be included into the
> > other code bases out there
>
> I hope that I've misunderstood your comm
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 16:56 +, Tim Ellison wrote:
>
>>I agree that getting a resolution to the community/licensing differences
>>would be fantastic. I don't see that happening quickly, and I don't
>>want to see the success or failure of a development project gated upon
>
For anyone who wants to play with the JCHEVM contribution, the code in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/harmony/enhanced/trunk/sandbox/contribs/jchevm/jchevm
should now be buildable and runnable (on x86 machines only).
The file APACHE.README contains some general info as well as instruc
Last week I didn't find the time to write this summary, so this week's
posting covers both weeks. It was two busy weeks on harmony-dev (I have
183 emails marked in my inbox), with a code contribution from IBM this
week: "The code comprises a concrete implementation of the interface
between virtual
