Boris Kuznetsov (JIRA) wrote:
NullPointerException in java.text.DecimalFormat.getCurrency()
-
Key: HARMONY-424
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-424
Project: Harmony
Type: Bug
Environment
I suggest that we first decide how we will test serialization,
otherwise we may make a low-level decision that will
make some high-level designs impossible
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/4/28, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > On 4/28/06, Paulex Yang wrote:
> >
> >> Paulex Yang
I meant that environment could be created, stored, and later
reused by other test methods.
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/4/28, Anton Avtamonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 4/28/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2006/4/28, Anton Avtamonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On 4/28/06, Mikhail Loenko <
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 4/28/06, Paulex Yang wrote:
Paulex Yang wrote:
I think two serialization test is necessary in general:
1. test for Harmony itself, which ensure that the object can be
serialized/deserialized smoothly within Harmony VM/classlib
2. test for compatibility with RI
On 4/28/06, Anton Avtamonov wrote:
> Stepan,
>
> I see everyone agree that we have to use the same approach accross the
> modules, but have no agreement on the particular test layout approach.
> May be you should initiate voting to choose the layout approach?
> Just to decide either to have tests
Richard Liang wrote:
Paulex Yang wrote:
I see, the OutputStreamWriterTest does fail, seems there's some
problem for CharsetDecoder to handling UTF-8 byte stream, but the
InputStreamReader itself should work because it pass all tests for
other decoding. I'll go on to study it.
And I also real
Paulex Yang wrote:
Vladimir Strigun wrote:
On 4/26/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Zhang wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/4/26, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Vladimir Strigun wrote:
On 4/26/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tr
On 4/28/06, Paulex Yang wrote:
>
> Paulex Yang wrote:
>
> > I think two serialization test is necessary in general:
> >
> > 1. test for Harmony itself, which ensure that the object can be
> > serialized/deserialized smoothly within Harmony VM/classlib
> > 2. test for compatibility with RI, which e
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/4/28, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
I suggest physically separate high-level suites:
src/test/
|
+- impl/
|
+- compliant/[names might be changed]
|
+- stress/
|
\- etc/
The
2006/4/28, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > I suggest physically separate high-level suites:
> >
> > src/test/
> >|
> >+- impl/
> >|
> >+- compliant/[names might be changed]
> >|
> >+- stress/
> >|
> >\
Stepan,
I see everyone agree that we have to use the same approach accross the
modules, but have no agreement on the particular test layout approach.
May be you should initiate voting to choose the layout approach?
Just to decide either to have tests in separate packages, separate
TestCases or tog
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 4/28/06, Anton Avtamonov wrote:
On 4/28/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 4/28/06, Anton Avtamonov wrote:
On 4/28/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 4/27/06, Anton Avtamonov wrote:
Which approach is better is very personal :-). I would ay t
Paulex Yang wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/4/28, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Anton Avtamonov wrote:
On 4/27/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As far as most of serialization tests extend SerializationTest then
having serialization test cases included into a r
Anton Avtamonov wrote:
On 4/28/06, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/27/06, Anton Avtamonov wrote:
On 4/27/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
I say leave them mixed. We are no more likely to want to run
serialization tests separately than we are locking tests etc. and trying
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
I suggest physically separate high-level suites:
src/test/
|
+- impl/
|
+- compliant/[names might be changed]
|
+- stress/
|
\- etc/
Then on package-level separate classpath from bootclasspath stuff
1) We will r
On 4/28/06, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/28/06, Anton Avtamonov wrote:
> >
> > On 4/28/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > On 4/28/06, Anton Avtamonov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 4/28/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > > On 4/27/06, Anton Avtamonov wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Whic
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/4/28, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Anton Avtamonov wrote:
On 4/27/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As far as most of serialization tests extend SerializationTest then
having serialization test cases included into a regular unit tests
17 matches
Mail list logo