Mark,
Does it make sense to add the test coverage script into the step 3), as
the tools in Harmony-564?
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 8 June 2006 at 8:01, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. I wasn't thinking of having unit or implementation tests
in here, as those still
Great!
Is it possible to see uncovered classes/methods/lines?
Thanks,
Mikhail
P.S. I think java.awt does not currently belong to beans module,
though who knows what the future may bring us :)
2006/6/13, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Latest Harmony API source coverage by Harmony API unit
Belated congratulations Mark !
--
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Please join the Apache Harmony PPMC in welcoming the project's newest
committer, Mark Hindess.
Mark has demonstrated the elements that help build a healthy community,
namely his ability to work together with others, continued
Nathan Beyer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
They are not quite equivalent, since the code above enumerates over the
actual 'values' keySet. If code calling attributeNames() removes a
value they are removing it from the FeatureDescriptor's
I created a JIRA about this issue, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-560
There is a patch attached if anyone wants to test it.
The license is at:
http://mx4j.sourceforge.net/docs/ch01s06.html
Any thoughts or comments about whether this is a reasonable thing to do?
The detailed info available at http://viv.byethost15.com/ (this address
also pointed on wiki-page).
Do you need additional information ?
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 6/13/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great!
Is it possible to see uncovered classes/methods/lines?
Thanks,
Mikhail
Weldon,
Thank you, for your interest. The main idea of the implementation is
just education of myself. I wanted to start with train algorithm to
better understand its pros and cons. I didn't supposed to stick with
that algorithm. Moreover, when just starting the implementation I
noticed some
Cool! Sorry, I've missed it
One more thing I've missed: what is the exclude list you've finally ended with?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/6/13, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The detailed info available at http://viv.byethost15.com/ (this address
also pointed on wiki-page).
Do you need additional
There is some enhancement on JNI spec in JDK 1.4[1], and three methods are
related to java.nio.ByteBuffer.
* |NewDirectByteBuffer|
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/jni/jni-14.html#NewDirectByteBuffer
* |GetDirectBufferAddress|
Nathan Beyer wrote:
snip
Does this mean we can stub out the luni-kernel System and just get the VMs
to implement it in their kernel classes using this method?
That's what I was thinking, and we can implement it in the luni-kernel /
classpathadapter as a reference for VMs if we so choose.
One more thing I've missed: what is the exclude list you've finally ended
with?
I'm going to publish it ASAP.
P.S. I think java.awt does not currently belong to beans module,
though who knows what the future may bring us :)
In fact, coverage information is gathered for each jar, that, to
Ah, I'm sorry, I think it's me misunderstand you.
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Sorry if I was confusing, the PriorityQueue is just a dependency of the
j.u.c. There are a few classes that us it internally, including the
PriorityBlockingQueue.
-Original Message-
From: Paulex Yang
Richard Liang (JIRA) wrote:
Hello Tim,
The patch still cannot pass the provided test case. :-) So Please apply my
patch.
According to Java Spec 1.5,
Enum constants are serialized differently than ordinary serializable or
externalizable objects.
To deserialize an enum
Nathan,
I've attached suggested fix to the JIRA issue. Seems that now we can
even beat the Reference Implementation on the microbenchmark ;)
No new test failures introduced, I assume this is enough to ensure
patch correctness.
2006/6/10, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Go for it. Just work out
I've update the web site by information about auth, crypto and rmi modules.
The exclude list also was added.
I'm not sure that all tests were run correctly so I'm going to verify test
runs.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 6/13/06, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more thing I've missed:
Paulex Yang wrote:
There is some enhancement on JNI spec in JDK 1.4[1], and three methods
are related to java.nio.ByteBuffer.
* |NewDirectByteBuffer|
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/jni/jni-14.html#NewDirectByteBuffer
* |GetDirectBufferAddress|
That's been the plan :)
I've had some conversations with Simone about this a while ago - I'd
really like to see the code come here since I think he seens an end of
life for MX4J as an indep project w/ jmx in Java SE.
I'll see if I can rekindle that convo here...
geir
Mark Hindess wrote:
I
Tim Ellison wrote:
Richard Liang (JIRA) wrote:
Hello Tim,
The patch still cannot pass the provided test case. :-) So Please apply my
patch.
According to Java Spec 1.5,
Enum constants are serialized differently than ordinary serializable or externalizable objects.
To deserialize
Hi all,
As you have probably noticed, I recently raised HARMONY-596
(which Mark has already kindly applied) to make .lib and .a files generate
straight into the deploy/lib directory.
I think that now we are in a position to finally modularise the classlib
native
code. I've volunteered to do
Hi Anton
Sorry I'm not a guru in keytools but why catch exceptions and resend them?
+try {
+// try to load the keystore
+keyStore.load(fis, storePass);
+} catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException e) {
+throw new NoSuchAlgorithmException(
+
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Hi all,
As you have probably noticed, I recently raised HARMONY-596
(which Mark has already kindly applied) to make .lib and .a files generate
straight into the deploy/lib directory.
I think that now we are in a position to finally modularise the classlib
native
Hi Ivan,
On 6/13/06, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, I have found small performance improvement to GCv4 which can be
easily added to it.
Could you please post more details about this possible perf enhancement
to V4?
...
Well, I'm going to do this development just for
Ivan,
Even if the vtable gc data layout change is small and code specific, it
will be interesting to see the change proposal here first, specially if you
are considering submitting it.
Sounds quite promising. 1.5% is not small. Some details of which workload
saw the 1.5% collection delta would
Is there any possibility of adding this to an Ant script that can optionally
be run with the build scripts? I'd like to make this easier for everyone to
run while developing.
Has anyone tried any other coverage tools? Like TPTP for Eclipse, Clover or
Corbetura (sp)?
-Nathan
-Original
On 6/13/06, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is some enhancement on JNI spec in JDK 1.4[1], and three methods are
related to java.nio.ByteBuffer.
* |NewDirectByteBuffer|
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/jni/jni-14.html#NewDirectByteBuffer
*
Paulex Yang wrote:
There is some enhancement on JNI spec in JDK 1.4[1], and three methods
are related to java.nio.ByteBuffer.
* |NewDirectByteBuffer|
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/jni/jni-14.html#NewDirectByteBuffer
* |GetDirectBufferAddress|
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Paulex Yang wrote:
There is some enhancement on JNI spec in JDK 1.4[1], and three
methods are related to java.nio.ByteBuffer.
* |NewDirectByteBuffer|
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/jni/jni-14.html#NewDirectByteBuffer
* |GetDirectBufferAddress|
Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Paulex Yang wrote:
There is some enhancement on JNI spec in JDK 1.4[1], and three
methods are related to java.nio.ByteBuffer.
* |NewDirectByteBuffer|
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/jni/jni-14.html#NewDirectByteBuffer
* |GetDirectBufferAddress|
I stubbed out the method in luni-kernel (as well as two other methods that
were missing). I looked at DRLVM and it already has nanoTime implementation,
but it's not using the method you mentioned. I took a peek at the
JCHEVM/classlibadaptar, but I couldn't quite discern the various artifacts.
Tim Ellison wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
I launch Eclipse 3.2 RC7 with options -Xms256M -Xmx256M -vm
D:\jdk\RI\jdk1.5.0_06\bin\javaw -Dpde.allowCycles=true
-Dpde.jreProfile=none,
But LUNI still cannot add luni-kernel-stubs.jar to its Plug-in
Dependencies. So I have to add
30 matches
Mail list logo
