On the 0x1A1 day of Apache Harmony Mark Hindess wrote:
On 8 July 2006 at 1:35, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/7/06, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7 July 2006 at 21:29, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/7/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that creating such wrappers and implementing non standard MS
extensions for another platforms is not a good idea. What will we do
if this extension will not be accepted? Rewrite everything again?
I agree that such extension is probably good. But we should wait until
community will accept
Nathan Beyer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is the default name, but you can change it with a command line
option -vm: and put it in a directory specified by -vmdir:,
e.g. java -vmdir:drlvm -vm:foo
Does this work for DRLVM now?
No,
The reference implementation doesn't make sense in this example, and it
is highly unlikely that any application will be dependent upon this
behavior, so I propose that we do not apply this patch.
If anyone objects to this decision I will happily reopen it.
Regards,
Tim
Vladimir Ivanov (JIRA)
Sorry. :(
Sometimes these discussions get so deep my brain can't parse all of the
characters.
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathan Beyer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is the default
Yes.
For the record, the point of that category is not only for JIRAs that
have been entered noting deviation and we make decisions on, but also a
place to record any deviation from either spec or RI (yes, it needs to
be renamed...)
geir
Nathan Beyer wrote:
I don't disagree with the
:)
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Sorry. :(
Sometimes these discussions get so deep my brain can't parse all of the
characters.
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathan Beyer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL
Tim Ellison wrote:
The reference implementation doesn't make sense in this example, and it
is highly unlikely that any application will be dependent upon this
behavior, so I propose that we do not apply this patch.
+1
(I pondered suggesting returning BigDecimal.valueOf(0), but that's not
thx
-
雅虎免费邮箱-3.5G容量，20M附件
Marina Goldburt wrote:
Tim, Paulex,
Will look at the file locking later...And I'm sure there are other
things worthing evaluation to be portlib extension.
And what is the way to extend the portlib functionality? If we add all the
missing functions to the HyPortLibrary structure, the
My idea is NOT to write wrappers for Microsoft extentions. First, they
are to enhance our own C code safety with more checkings; second, they
are not MS extensions. The only thing is, they are enlighted by and
have similar APIs as MS's safe CRT.
Thanks,
xiaofeng
On 7/9/06, Alexey Petrenko
Richard Liang wrote:
Paulex Yang wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Hello All,
After read through the document recommended by Alex, I think TestNG
can really meet our requirement. It provides much flexibility for
test configuration. ;-)
If we decide to transfer to TestNG, we shall:
1.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
For this case, I decide to follow useRadix(int radix). Please correct
me if I'm wrong. Thanks a lot.
Do you mean that you're going to follow the spec? If so, we
13 matches
Mail list logo
