Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-09-18 Thread Anton Luht
Hello, I've created a patch that adds task 'eclipsehwa' (Eclipse 'Hello, world!' application) to Harmony classlib build.xml . It's attached to the issue. You can run ant -Dharmony.vm.exe=... -Declipse-home=eclipse 3.2 root eclipsehwa and Eclipse will start, create a project, create a test

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-07-04 Thread Anton Luht
Hello, I've created an Eclipse automated test based on Salikh's code - please see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-752 I've tested it on Windows XP on Eclipse that goes with harmony VM - eclipse-SDK-3.1.1-win32.zip Sometimes (irregularry) after execution it prints some stack

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-27 Thread Vladimir Ivanov
Seems, it is not so easy to define the proper test set... Let's define target to run the integration test. It may be: 1) we want to be sure that all were integrated correctly? 2) or we want to guaranty the 'product quality' for build? 3) some other? If target is 1) than we should run minimal

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-27 Thread Anton Luht
Good day, Anyway it seems that creating an automated Eclipse scenario as described by Salikh will be useful. I'll try to create the scenario, corresponding build target and file a JIRA issue with patch for the new functionality. On 6/27/06, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems, it is

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-27 Thread Vladimir Ivanov
Do not you think these should be different Eclipse scenarios?: 1) simple scenario that run Eclipse, compile small application and runs it 2) simple debug scenario 3) scenario that runs ant-builder 4-N) other scenarios that emulate user work Am I correct that you are going to use record and play

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-27 Thread Anton Luht
Vladimir, Regarding what tool will be used - I don't know yet. I'm studying Eclipse plugins right now. Seems like the situation with standard macro recording and playback in Eclipse is not very good now [1], so the emulation will be based on one of Eclipse plugins or will be a hand-written

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-27 Thread Salikh Zakirov
Vladimir Ivanov wrote: Do not you think these should be different Eclipse scenarios?: 1) simple scenario that run Eclipse, compile small application and runs it 2) simple debug scenario 3) scenario that runs ant-builder 4-N) other scenarios that emulate user work Doing multiple scenarios

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-26 Thread Anton Luht
Alexey, As far as I understand Andrey, he suggests to run tests when a piece of code is integrated into the code base, by the person who has access to the repository (committer). A developer shouldn't test his piece of code on any platform, though it'd be good if he did it and reported results

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-26 Thread Alexey Petrenko
Yes, I understand this. But are you sure that every committer now and in the future has access to the different platforms and configurations? Committers, are you? :) 2006/6/26, Anton Luht [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alexey, As far as I understand Andrey, he suggests to run tests when a piece of code

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-26 Thread Tim Ellison
Alexey Petrenko wrote: Yes, I understand this. But are you sure that every committer now and in the future has access to the different platforms and configurations? Committers, are you? :) If I'm patching some general Java code then I just test on my local workstation and wait for the

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-26 Thread Salikh Zakirov
Anton Luht wrote: As far as I understand Andrey, he suggests to run tests when a piece of code is integrated into the code base, by the person who has access to the repository (committer). A developer shouldn't test his piece of code on any platform, though it'd be good if he did it and

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-26 Thread Salikh Zakirov
Alexey Petrenko wrote: Some checks before commits are defenetly good... 2006/6/23, Andrey Chernyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: We may probably also need to define the list of platforms/configurations covered by this procedure. I'm not sure that I get your idea correctly. Do you suggest to ask

[DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-23 Thread Andrey Chernyshev
Folks, Once we have started to do the changes for drlvm, may be it is a good time to think about what tests should be passed prior to changes integration (and what kind of verification to expect before sending a patch). So far the following comes to my mind: - running build test (it executes a

Re: [DRLVM] Integration checks (was building from svn on FC5)

2006-06-23 Thread Alexey Petrenko
Some checks before commits are defenetly good... 2006/6/23, Andrey Chernyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: We may probably also need to define the list of platforms/configurations covered by this procedure. I'm not sure that I get your idea correctly. Do you suggest to ask every developer to make some