Re: [arch] How much of java.* and friends does Harmony need towrite. Was: VM/Classlibrary interface

2005-06-06 Thread Sven de Marothy
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 10:01 -0400, Aaron Hamid wrote: > Gah. :( > > So if I am to understand this correctly: Classpath java.lang.* implementation > does not rely on specifics of any given VM* interface implementation, but said > VM* interface implementations MAY rely on internals of existing Cl

Re: [arch] How much of java.* and friends does Harmony need towrite. Was: VM/Classlibrary interface

2005-06-06 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jun 6, 2005, at 10:01 AM, Aaron Hamid wrote: Gah. :( So if I am to understand this correctly: Classpath java.lang.* implementation does not rely on specifics of any given VM* interface implementation, but said VM* interface implementations MAY rely on internals of existing Classpath

Re: [arch] How much of java.* and friends does Harmony need towrite. Was: VM/Classlibrary interface

2005-06-06 Thread Aaron Hamid
Gah. :( So if I am to understand this correctly: Classpath java.lang.* implementation does not rely on specifics of any given VM* interface implementation, but said VM* interface implementations MAY rely on internals of existing Classpath java.lang.* classes? (so there is a one-way dependency

Re: [arch] How much of java.* and friends does Harmony need towrite. Was: VM/Classlibrary interface

2005-06-06 Thread David P Grove
>From a user perspective, Jikes RVM uses classpath "out of the box". (It builds with unmodified GNU classpath releases and classpath cvs head; we don't distribute GNU classpath with Jikes RVM). We do provide our own versions of a few classes in java.* that the build process selects instead of

Re: [arch] How much of java.* and friends does Harmony need towrite. Was: VM/Classlibrary interface

2005-06-06 Thread Sven de Marothy
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 00:26 +0200, Santiago Gala wrote: > El dom, 05-06-2005 a las 01:56 -0500, Dan Lydick escribió: > (...) > > > > I suppose I need to do some more homework then. > > If GNU Classpath is used without modification for > > numerous VM's, then great! Ultimately, what I am > > A fe

Re: [arch] How much of java.* and friends does Harmony need towrite. Was: VM/Classlibrary interface

2005-06-05 Thread Santiago Gala
El dom, 05-06-2005 a las 01:56 -0500, Dan Lydick escribió: (...) > > I suppose I need to do some more homework then. > If GNU Classpath is used without modification for > numerous VM's, then great! Ultimately, what I am A few classes need to be modified: - jamvm (from README): "A number of clas

Re: [arch] How much of java.* and friends does Harmony need towrite. Was: VM/Classlibrary interface

2005-06-04 Thread Dan Lydick
> [Original Message] > From: Sven de Marothy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Date: 6/4/05 3:49:37 PM > Subject: Re: [arch] How much of java.* and friends does Harmony need towrite. Was: VM/Classlibrary interface > > On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 21:44 +0200, Santiago Gala

Re: [arch] How much of java.* and friends does Harmony need towrite. Was: VM/Classlibrary interface

2005-06-04 Thread Dan Lydick
> [Original Message] > From: Sven de Marothy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: > Date: 6/4/05 10:59:31 AM > Subject: Re: [arch] How much of java.* and friends does Harmony need towrite. Was: VM/Classlibrary interface > > On Fri, 2005-06