Re: [classlib][awt] dependency cleanup and potential build breakage

2006-10-26 Thread Mark Hindess
I've checked these changes in now. Linux developers should be able to fix the dependencies with something like: for f in depends/libs/build/*/*.ia32 ;do mv $f ${f%.ia32}.linux.x86;done for f in depends/libs/build/*/*.ipf ;do mv $f ${f%.ipf}.linux.x86_64;done Regards, Mark. On 25 October

Re: [classlib][awt] dependency cleanup and potential build breakage

2006-10-26 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Done http://people.apache.org/~geirm/harmony/swing_awt_deps_winxp_2006-10-26.tgz Mark Hindess wrote: On 25 October 2006 at 9:04, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Hindess wrote: Currently there is a quick hack in make/depends.xml because the awt dependencies have extensions

[classlib][awt] dependency cleanup and potential build breakage

2006-10-25 Thread Mark Hindess
Currently there is a quick hack in make/depends.xml because the awt dependencies have extensions that use a different convention for architecture names than the one used in the rest of classlib. I'm going to fix the README, build.xml files, and makefiles to use the standard harmony define for

Re: [classlib][awt] dependency cleanup and potential build breakage

2006-10-25 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Mark Hindess wrote: Currently there is a quick hack in make/depends.xml because the awt dependencies have extensions that use a different convention for architecture names than the one used in the rest of classlib. I'm going to fix the README, build.xml files, and makefiles to use the

Re: [classlib][awt] dependency cleanup and potential build breakage

2006-10-25 Thread Mark Hindess
On 25 October 2006 at 9:04, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Hindess wrote: Currently there is a quick hack in make/depends.xml because the awt dependencies have extensions that use a different convention for architecture names than the one used in the rest of classlib.