[classlib] Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches

2006-08-08 Thread Tim Ellison
Once I apply the HARMONY-1084 patches, the classlib code will only be usable with the new IBM VME v4 available now from Developerworks [1]. Can other VM folk let me know if/when they are comfortable with that patch being applied? The contents were described by Oliver, and the patch file is short

Re: [classlib] Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches

2006-08-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Tim Ellison wrote: Once I apply the HARMONY-1084 patches, the classlib code will only be usable with the new IBM VME v4 available now from Developerworks [1]. We need to make sure that DRLVM is ready first, although looking at the the patch, I'm not sure there's much to be done. Worrysome,

Re: [classlib] Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches

2006-08-08 Thread Tim Ellison
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Tim Ellison wrote: Once I apply the HARMONY-1084 patches, the classlib code will only be usable with the new IBM VME v4 available now from Developerworks [1]. We need to make sure that DRLVM is ready first, although looking at the the patch, I'm not sure there's

Re: [classlib] Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches

2006-08-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
The launcher changes wouldn't affect DRLVM, and it seems like the com.ibm.oti - org.apache.harmony wouldn't either, strangely... geir Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Tim Ellison wrote: Once I apply the HARMONY-1084 patches, the classlib code will only be usable with the new IBM

Re: [classlib] Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches

2006-08-08 Thread Tim Ellison
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: The launcher changes wouldn't affect DRLVM, and it seems like the com.ibm.oti - org.apache.harmony wouldn't either, strangely... Must be using it's own equivalent property. And generating 5.0 classfiles is ok, right? So are we good to go? Tim geir Tim Ellison

Re: [classlib] Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches

2006-08-08 Thread Mark Hindess
On 8 August 2006 at 12:26, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: The launcher changes wouldn't affect DRLVM, and it seems like the com.ibm.oti - org.apache.harmony wouldn't either, strangely... Must be using it's own equivalent property. And generating 5.0