Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George
I did not know that. When I run ant test -Dtest.jre.home=... for some
odd reason this test does not run at all. I'll try to figure out why.
I completely agree that the test should pass on RI. I'll fix the test.
The old version of the test copied files on the
Hi George!
HARMONY-88 contribution contains a file MockJavaBean2.bin
that seems to be a binary representation of
tests.api.java.beans.mock.MockJavaBean2 class
in r406595 you have modifed BeansTest.java, for example
Beans.instantiate(loader,tests.api.java.beans.mock.MockJavaBean2);
was
Hi Mikhail,
Just seen your note. Yes, of course, I will look at this immediately.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Best regards,
George
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George!
HARMONY-88 contribution contains a file MockJavaBean2.bin
that seems to be a binary representation of
Hi,
I looked at this earlier on (soon after my first note) and found that
the matter seemed to already been resolved ?
Best regards,
George
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George!
HARMONY-88 contribution contains a file MockJavaBean2.bin
that seems to be a binary representation of
Hi Mikhail,
You are probably already aware of this but the tests that use the
SerClassLoader custom class loader result in a StackOverflowError when
run against the RI. The overridden implementation of
findResource(String) calls getResource(String) which, according to the
spec, may end up
George Harley wrote:
Hi Mikhail,
You are probably already aware of this but the tests that use the
SerClassLoader custom class loader result in a StackOverflowError when
run against the RI. The overridden implementation of
findResource(String) calls getResource(String) which, according to
Hi George
I did not know that. When I run ant test -Dtest.jre.home=... for some
odd reason this test does not run at all. I'll try to figure out why.
I completely agree that the test should pass on RI. I'll fix the test.
The old version of the test copied files on the disk in many test
Not completely. We still miss the source.
2006/7/12, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I looked at this earlier on (soon after my first note) and found that
the matter seemed to already been resolved ?
Best regards,
George
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George!
HARMONY-88 contribution
