[classlib] policy file

why has our permissions policy file (in jre/lib/security) gone from java.policy - drl.policy, lost its license etc. ? Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.

Re: [classlib] policy file

java.security also does not have a license... Why do you think they have to have a license? Thanks, Mikhail On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why has our permissions policy file (in jre/lib/security) gone from java.policy - drl.policy, lost its license etc. ? Regards, Tim

Re: [classlib] policy file

I meant it's copyright / license block comment. Same reason every other files does. ...and why drl.policy? any objection to changing it back? Regards, Tim Mikhail Loenko wrote: java.security also does not have a license... Why do you think they have to have a license? Thanks, Mikhail

Re: [classlib] policy file

It probably has been that way for weeks, since we switched to security2. Easy fix... Tim Ellison wrote: why has our permissions policy file (in jre/lib/security) gone from java.policy - drl.policy, lost its license etc. ? Regards, Tim

Re: [classlib] policy file

We historically have add the Apache License to all of our files. We should do this here for consistency, but it's not critical - I expect our policies to change to eliminate this practice at some point in the near future. If we do a release though before that policy change happens, we should

Re: [classlib] policy file

I actually have an objection to *that* name, so I will if you don't... Tim Ellison wrote: I meant it's copyright / license block comment. Same reason every other files does. ...and why drl.policy? any objection to changing it back? Regards, Tim Mikhail Loenko wrote: java.security also

Re: [classlib] policy file

Mikhail Loenko wrote: On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I meant it's copyright / license block comment. Same reason every other files does. That is not a source code, BTW corresponding RI's files do not have copyrights. We don't care - we put it on all resources. See our

Re: [classlib] policy file

Actually, looking at it, it makes no sense to have this coming from module/security anyway. I'll revert to using the one from depends/files geir Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Mikhail Loenko wrote: On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I meant it's copyright / license block