Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> The summary of what I think we should do is simple - we take the code
> from j.u.c from the above link (w/ 1 exception) into our SVN repo and
> track any changes made by Doug and the jsr166 EG going forward.
>>
Nathan Beyer wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
>>> Can you expand on that for me? Why isn't a binary dependency
>> sufficient?
>>
>> It would be if there was one
> -Original Message-
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tim Ellison wrote:
> > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> >> Tim Ellison wrote:
> >>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> I had a nice chat with Doug today to try to reach a conclusion
> regarding
> j.u.c
>
> Gi
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I had a nice chat with Doug today to try to reach a conclusion regarding
j.u.c
Given that everyone else (Sun, IBM, BEA...) seems to use j.u.c, found here
http://gee.cs.os
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>> I had a nice chat with Doug today to try to reach a conclusion regarding
>>> j.u.c
>>>
>>> Given that everyone else (Sun, IBM, BEA...) seems to use j.u.c, found here
>>>
>>> http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi
>> -Nathan
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 6:54 PM
>>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: [classlib] proposal - resolution to java.ut
6:54 PM
>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [classlib] proposal - resolution to java.util.concurrent
>> issue
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, J
athan
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 6:54 PM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [classlib] proposal - resolution to java.util.concurrent
> issue
>
> > -Original Message-
>
t;> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 10:29 AM
>>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: [classlib] proposal - resolution to java.util.concurrent issue
>>>
>>> I had a nice chat with Do
> -Original Message-
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 6:37 PM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [classlib] proposal - resolution to java.util.concurrent
> issue
>
>
>
> Nathan B
n
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 10:29 AM
>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [classlib] proposal - resolution to java.util.concurrent issue
>>
>> I had
; To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [classlib] proposal - resolution to java.util.concurrent issue
>
> I had a nice chat with Doug today to try to reach a conclusion regarding
> j.u.c
>
> Given that everyone else (Sun, IBM, BEA...) seems to use j.u.c, found here
>
> http:/
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> I had a nice chat with Doug today to try to reach a conclusion regarding
>> j.u.c
>>
>> Given that everyone else (Sun, IBM, BEA...) seems to use j.u.c, found here
>>
>> http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/main/java/util/concurre
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> I had a nice chat with Doug today to try to reach a conclusion regarding
> j.u.c
>
> Given that everyone else (Sun, IBM, BEA...) seems to use j.u.c, found here
>
> http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/main/java/util/concurrent/
>
> I think that we'd
I had a nice chat with Doug today to try to reach a conclusion regarding
j.u.c
Given that everyone else (Sun, IBM, BEA...) seems to use j.u.c, found here
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/main/java/util/concurrent/
I think that we'd be well-served to do so as well. It's th
15 matches
Mail list logo
