Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think that it's totally unreasonable to have no upper bound on stack
size. A Java virtual machine should never be able to hose a machine by
sucking in all memory...
yeah, like those rotten C programs. You are damned if you do and damned
if you don't, since you'll
Can we get the value from the harmonyvm.properties file?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/17, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think that it's totally unreasonable to have no upper bound on stack
size. A Java virtual machine should never be able to hose a machine by
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum
stack size, doesn't it?
What does lower stack limit mean? :) I think that it's
16 Nov 2006 14:48:05 +0600, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum
stack size, doesn't it?
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Alexey Varlamov wrote:
16 Nov 2006 14:48:05 +0600, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum
stack size, doesn't it?
What does lower stack limit mean? :) I think
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum
stack
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum
stack size, doesn't it?
What does lower stack limit mean? :) I think
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum
stack size, doesn't it?
What does lower
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum
On 11/15/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How could there be no limit to stack size??
Limit is there but it's too large, like 2 in power 46.
Is there a way the test framework could set this? Does DRLVM support
-Xss yet?
No, DRLVM doesn't support –Xss flag. …yet.
I
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/13/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point to have a test which would pass either way? Check
that it doesn't crash the VM, is it the only purpose for it?
I think yes. It should check
On 11/13/06, Pavel Afremov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I think that Stack test should print pass if no stack overflow error is
happened.
Test should check processing of this error but not existing of it.
I think that this makes sense. StackTest should be intended to detect
correct
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/13/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point to have a test which would pass either way? Check
that it doesn't crash the VM, is it the only purpose for it?
I
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/13/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point to have a test which would pass either way?
Check
that it doesn't crash the VM, is
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/15/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How could there be no limit to stack size??
Limit is there but it's too large, like 2 in power 46.
Is there a way the test framework could set this? Does DRLVM support
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum stack
size, doesn't it?
What does lower stack limit mean? :) I think that it's the size of
the stack, max.
I thought it is a starting stack
On the 0x221 day of Apache Harmony Mika Miettinen wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 00:51 Gregory Shimansky wrote:
I'm going to try to do this on my Gentoo at home now. It is mostly
bleeding edge up to date installation.
Now I see what you're talking about.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 00:51 Gregory Shimansky wrote:
I'm going to try to do this on my Gentoo at home now. It is mostly
bleeding edge up to date installation.
Now I see what you're talking about. The threading library of classlib doesn't
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 00:51 Gregory Shimansky wrote:
I'm going to try to do this on my Gentoo at home now. It is mostly
bleeding edge up to date installation.
Now I see what you're talking about. The threading
On 11/13/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point to have a test which would pass either way? Check
that it doesn't crash the VM, is it the only purpose for it?
I think yes. It should check that test doesn't crash VM if stack size isn't
enough.
Pasha Afremov.
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 00:51 Gregory Shimansky wrote:
I'm going to try to do this on my Gentoo at home now. It is mostly
bleeding edge up to date installation.
Now I see what you're talking about. The threading library of classlib doesn't
compile on
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/13/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point to have a test which would pass either way? Check
that it doesn't crash the VM, is it the only purpose for it?
I think yes. It should check that test doesn't crash VM if stack size isn't
enough.
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/13/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point to have a test which would pass either way? Check
that it doesn't crash the VM, is it the only purpose for it?
I think yes. It should check that test doesn't crash VM
Mika Miettinen wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 00:51 Gregory Shimansky wrote:
I'm going to try to do this on my Gentoo at home now. It is mostly
bleeding edge up to date installation.
Now I see what you're talking about. The threading library of classlib
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 02:36 Pavel Pervov wrote:
Gregory,
Could you look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2152. I
believe it'll fix the build.
Thank you for a quick fix. The build works now. Don't try to run acceptance
tests though. The
Hello
I think that Stack test should print pass if no stack overflow error is
happened.
Test should check processing of this error but not existing of it.
Optimizing compiler can do very deep recursion unrolling, and SOE can happen
never in this case.
Thanks
Pavel Afremov.
On
Pavel Afremov wrote:
Hello
I think that Stack test should print pass if no stack overflow error is
happened.
Test should check processing of this error but not existing of it.
Optimizing compiler can do very deep recursion unrolling, and SOE can
happen
never in this case.
So what is
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 02:36 Pavel Pervov wrote:
Gregory,
Could you look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2152. I
believe it'll fix the build.
Thank you for a quick fix. The build works now. Don't try to run
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 02:36 Pavel Pervov wrote:
Gregory,
Could you look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2152. I
believe it'll fix the build.
Thank you for a quick fix. The build works now.
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 00:51 Gregory Shimansky wrote:
I'm going to try to do this on my Gentoo at home now. It is mostly
bleeding edge up to date installation.
Now I see what you're talking about. The threading library of classlib doesn't
compile on x86_64. It fails with the same error
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 00:51 Gregory Shimansky wrote:
I'm going to try to do this on my Gentoo at home now. It is mostly
bleeding edge up to date installation.
Now I see what you're talking about. The threading library of classlib
doesn't
compile on x86_64.
Stefano,
(you guys rock, btw!)
We do sometime. ;)
and googling for hyzip doesn't yield anything interesting.
Hyzlib is something that is build along with classlib (it is part of
ZipSupport in classlib). As you didn't finish classlib build, you do not
have hyzlib.
But VMI requires hyzlib
Pavel Pervov wrote:
Stefano,
(you guys rock, btw!)
We do sometime. ;)
:-D
and googling for hyzip doesn't yield anything interesting.
Hyzlib is something that is build along with classlib (it is part of
ZipSupport in classlib). As you didn't finish classlib build, you do not
have
I've managed to get everything in place for a DRLVM build.. it runs for
a while and then it fails with these errors:
[cc]
/home/stefano/src/harmony/drlvm/vm/vmcore/src/util/em64t/base/jit_lock_rt_support_em64t.cpp:
In function ‘void* rth_get_lil_monitor_enter()’:
[cc]
Same for me. I saw this yesterday. It is because HARMONY-1558 has changed
Class interfaces but didn't change x86_64 specific files. Now that I look at
the error messages, I think it is quite easy to fix the build. I'll take care
of weekend.
I wonder how did you get to building drlvm if
DRLVM build always requires prebuilt classlib...
I believe ia32 classlib is ok until linking happens.
On 11/11/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same for me. I saw this yesterday. It is because HARMONY-1558 has changed
Class interfaces but didn't change x86_64 specific files. Now
On 11/10/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same for me. I saw this yesterday. It is because HARMONY-1558 has changed
Sorry about that. I looked at Stefano's error messages. They are very
similar to the ones we battled a few days ago on linux 32-bit platform.
Pavel Pervov can
On Saturday 11 November 2006 01:43 Weldon Washburn wrote:
On 11/10/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same for me. I saw this yesterday. It is because HARMONY-1558 has changed
Sorry about that. I looked at Stefano's error messages. They are very
similar to the ones we battled a
It looks like I'll have the patch ready in a few minutes.
Sorry for breaking this.
On 11/11/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 01:43 Weldon Washburn wrote:
On 11/10/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same for me. I saw this yesterday. It
Gregory,
Could you look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2152. I
believe it'll fix the build.
On 11/11/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 01:43 Weldon Washburn wrote:
On 11/10/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same for
On Saturday 11 November 2006 02:36 Pavel Pervov wrote:
Gregory,
Could you look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2152. I
believe it'll fix the build.
Thank you for a quick fix. The build works now. Don't try to run acceptance
tests though. The StackTest is a machine killer. It
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 02:36 Pavel Pervov wrote:
Gregory,
Could you look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2152. I
believe it'll fix the build.
Thank you for a quick fix. The build works now. Don't try to run acceptance
tests though. The
45 matches
Mail list logo
