Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-10-02 Thread Ivan Volosyuk
I have fixed a problem in gc_alloc(), see HARMONY-1661. After that test passes on my computer. -- Ivan On 10/2/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, I will look at the issue today. -- Ivan On 10/2/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2006/10/2, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-10-02 Thread Ivan Volosyuk
Ok, I will look at the issue today. -- Ivan On 10/2/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2006/10/2, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Trace logging gives some more details: > > GC enumeration in interpreter stack: > > 0x0x413ee828 referenced from root = 0x0x52

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-10-02 Thread Elena Semukhina
This issue is accompanied now with similar crash on Windows (interpreter): [echo] RUNNING : java.lang.RuntimeTest [junit] This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unu sual way. [junit] Please contact the application's support team for more information. [junit]

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-10-02 Thread Alexey Varlamov
2006/10/2, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Trace logging gives some more details: GC enumeration in interpreter stack: 0x0x413ee828 referenced from root = 0x0x52721d4c info = 0 0x0x413ee828 info = 0 0x0x413ee828 is java/lang/Class move 0x0x413ee828 to 0x0x41253d24 info

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-10-02 Thread Alexey Varlamov
Trace logging gives some more details: GC enumeration in interpreter stack: 0x0x413ee828 referenced from root = 0x0x52721d4c info = 0 0x0x413ee828 info = 0 0x0x413ee828 is java/lang/Class move 0x0x413ee828 to 0x0x41253d24 info = 1 0x(nil) referenced from object = 0x0x41253d24

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-10-02 Thread Alexey Varlamov
Today this crash is reproduced quite stably during "build.sh kernel.test". But it always passes if run standalone :( Regarding 1559 patch, I looked through it and found nothing suspicious. The only change to interpreter itself was actually preliminary fix for Harmony-1561. This is not good (1559

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-10-01 Thread Alexey Varlamov
2006/9/28, Elena Semukhina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The issue has gone away for me too, false alarm possibly... Unfortunately the alarm was not false. Today I got the same failure: ... [junit] SIGABRT in VM code. [junit] java: /nfs/ins/proj/drl/coreapi/avarlamo/harmony/linux.ia32/svn-repo/

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-09-28 Thread Elena Semukhina
The issue has gone away for me too, false alarm possibly... Elena On 9/28/06, Pavel Rebriy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've just repeated kernel.test run today several times on fresh build, and tests pass. It's a very stange crash. Execute JIT stack iterator in interpreter mode.. It's outlandis

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-09-27 Thread Pavel Rebriy
I've just repeated kernel.test run today several times on fresh build, and tests pass. It's a very stange crash. Execute JIT stack iterator in interpreter mode.. It's outlandishly. On 28/09/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I do not observe this crash - I ran kernel tests yesterday

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-09-27 Thread Alexey Varlamov
I do not observe this crash - I ran kernel tests yesterday and today several times, no crashes on interpreter on Linux IA32... 2006/9/28, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wednesday 27 September 2006 16:35 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > :) > > Is there an easy fix, or do we rollback? Inte

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-09-27 Thread Gregory Shimansky
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 16:35 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > :) > > Is there an easy fix, or do we rollback? Interpreter is meant for the development for the most part. I think it is not critical if it doesn't work for a short time. It is not used by most of the community anyway because the

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-09-27 Thread Elena Semukhina
I just wondered what changed after yesterday, rolled back HARMONY-1559 patch and so discovered cause-effect relation. I can say nothing about the fix, we should ask the patch submitter :( On 9/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :) Is there an easy fix, or do we rollback? g

Re: [drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-09-27 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
:) Is there an easy fix, or do we rollback? geir On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Elena Semukhina wrote: Hi all, after HARMONY-1559 patch has been committed, kernel unit test RuntimeTest started to fail on linux in the interpreter mode. It loops with the message [junit] SIGABRT in VM cod

[drlvm] HARMONY-1559 patch causes SIGABRT in VM code

2006-09-27 Thread Elena Semukhina
Hi all, after HARMONY-1559 patch has been committed, kernel unit test RuntimeTest started to fail on linux in the interpreter mode. It loops with the message [junit] SIGABRT in VM code. [junit] java: /nfs/ins/proj/drl/coreapi/esemukhi/git/drlvm/trunk/vm/port/src/lil/ia32/pim/stack_iterator