Both ways make sense to me, tagging for ease of primary filtering
emails/JIRAs etc, and explicit component for advanced search in JIRA.
As for the name, I don't care - port-XXX or platform-XXX...
2006/10/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
It looks like I really
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and when I create a new issue I can choose only one of the components.
No, you can choose more than one. Try using shift-click or something.
Thanks Geir, now I understand why JIRA does not need subcomponents.
So according to your
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and when I create a new issue I can choose only one of the components.
No, you can choose more than one. Try using shift-click or something.
Thanks Geir, now I understand why JIRA does not need subcomponents.
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Geir, now I understand why JIRA does not need subcomponents.
Explain it to me then :) I still think subcomponents would be cool,
since it would allow some structuring...
If you want to see all issues from the virtual
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Geir, now I understand why JIRA does not need subcomponents.
Explain it to me then :) I still think subcomponents would be cool,
since it would allow some structuring...
If you want to see all issues
Multiple selection does only logical OR operation on components selected.
E.g. if I select DRLVM component only get 239 issues. If I select
Contributions component I get 48 issues. If I select both of them I get
285 issues...(is it a bug?)
If we had a logical AND operation support for components
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
Multiple selection does only logical OR operation on components selected.
E.g. if I select DRLVM component only get 239 issues. If I select
Contributions component I get 48 issues. If I select both of them I get
285 issues...(is it a bug?)
If we had a logical AND
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, we need an AND.
Is it possible for us to get it from JIRA developers?
--
Mikhail Fursov
Altrenative idea would be to use just architecture name as the first
classification tag for architecture specific issues (including porting to
that arcitecture).
Examples can be: [ipf], [ia32], [em64t], etc.
Example of JIRA could be: [ipf][classlib][awt] natives build is broken
Regards,
On 10/15/06, Pavel Pervov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Altrenative idea would be to use just architecture name as the first
classification tag for architecture specific issues (including porting to
that arcitecture).
Examples can be: [ipf], [ia32], [em64t], etc.
Example of JIRA could be:
That works for me. then the same token could also be prefixed to
email subject lines, like you suggest.
Note that people should also select more than one category when filing a
platform specific bug/issue/feature/whatever such has DRLVM and
IPF or Classlibrary and Sparc :)
geir
Pavel
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 10/15/06, Pavel Pervov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Altrenative idea would be to use just architecture name as the first
classification tag for architecture specific issues (including porting to
that arcitecture).
Examples can be: [ipf], [ia32], [em64t], etc.
Example of
It looks like I really do not understand your proposal about JIRA naming.
I do not know what category is. I see the list of independent components
here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY
and when I create a new issue I can choose only one of the components.
Do you mean that IPF could
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
It looks like I really do not understand your proposal about JIRA naming.
I do not know what category is. I see the list of independent components
here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY
yes, that's it.
and when I create a new issue I can choose only one of
I was thinking about the recent IPF thread, and was going to add a
DRLVM-IPF category so we can track things easier.
But this is dumb - there are other things for porting, like stuff in
classlib and the launcher tools (maybe).
Anyway, how does Port-platform sound as a pattern? so in this
15 matches
Mail list logo
