On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:52 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Right, but the system can easily automate doing the three steps
On 9/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We seem to be having a bit of a communication issue. No, he wouldn't
miss it, because the system would send mail in that case.
The system would send mail in case of failure for every case, and
only success for the tests, as you seemed to
On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:14 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you can send just one email with a summary of everything that
happened during that run.
The fact that the system did :
call fetch-depends
call build clean
call build
On 9/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:14 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you can send just one email with a summary of everything that
happened during that run.
The fact that the system did :
On Sep 27, 2006, at 9:11 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I ask what you are trying to do? The build-test thingy wont' get
simpler because of this patch, because we want the build-test tool to
record it's actions in fine detail, and the
On 9/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How will you be able to grab that information from the logs, so I can
see histories and such? I'm not going to go manually scanning logs.
I want a web page that shows me the history. This is what the CI
system does right now. Why would
On Sep 27, 2006, at 10:12 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How will you be able to grab that information from the logs, so I can
see histories and such? I'm not going to go manually scanning logs.
I want a web page that shows me the
On 9/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:49 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Actually, now 3 targets should be called one-by-one (4 in case of
vm)
On Sep 26, 2006, at 2:49 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:49 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Actually, now 3
On 9/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Right, but the system can easily automate doing the three steps in
phases. The build-test infrastructure does that already. Well get
timing info too...
Yes, but some people want to receive one notification for one module (like
On Sep 26, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Right, but the system can easily automate doing the three steps in
phases. The build-test infrastructure does that already. Well get
timing info too...
Yes, but some people
On 9/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Right, but the system can easily automate doing the three steps in
phases. The build-test infrastructure does that
Now I install the BT infrastructure on the 2 comp's: win and linux. It is
woks (with small improvements. the readme.txt was updated to describe it),
but I want to discuss adding a new top-level target to the vm/API builds
(for example, 'all').
This target will do nothing but depends on
- for
On Sep 25, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Now I install the BT infrastructure on the 2 comp's: win and
linux. It is
woks (with small improvements. the readme.txt was updated to
describe it),
but I want to discuss adding a new top-level target to the vm/API
builds
(for example,
On 9/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Seems, it will be convenient for automatic (or nightly) building
and testing
Harmony and, may be, newbie who want to look to what is Harmony
today
without documentation readingJ.
On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:49 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 9/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Seems, it will be convenient for automatic (or nightly) building
and testing
Harmony and, may be, newbie who want to look to
16 matches
Mail list logo
