Mark,
Does it make sense to add the test coverage script into the step 3), as
the tools in Harmony-564?
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 8 June 2006 at 8:01, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. I wasn't thinking of having unit or implementation tests
in here, as those still
Here is what I see how we can place in SVN what we have or potentially can
have some time in the future:
SVN:
/testing
/vm
/some_test_suite//dedicated vm tests, if any
/build //test suite build
/tests //test suite tests
On 8 June 2006 at 8:01, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. I wasn't thinking of having unit or implementation tests
in here, as those still should be near the subcomponent, be it VM,
classlib, etc, but larger 'end-to-end' functional tests ? I don't know
if that makes
