Hi Rodrigo,
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 15:40 -0700, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
> For the rest I strongly suggest using Mauve, it can test a lot of the
> classlib and would be nice to have only one FOSS testsuite for
> classlibs.
Completely agreed. Mauve is a collaboration of several companies and
organisa
On 10/18/05, Zsejki Sorin Miklós <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
>
> >On 10/18/05, Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>This won´t help to find the spots that require memory barriers, as
> >>>these are only an issue on SMP sys
Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
On 10/18/05, Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
This won´t help to find the spots that require memory barriers, as
these are only an issue on SMP systems. But your idea should not be
discarded as it may help with other kinds of problem
On 10/18/05, Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
> > This won´t help to find the spots that require memory barriers, as
> > these are only an issue on SMP systems. But your idea should not be
> > discarded as it may help with other kinds of problems.
>
> Good point.. in
Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
This won´t help to find the spots that require memory barriers, as
these are only an issue on SMP systems. But your idea should not be
discarded as it may help with other kinds of problems.
Good point.. interesting question how you could check that too..
perhaps for multi
This won´t help to find the spots that require memory barriers, as
these are only an issue on SMP systems. But your idea should not be
discarded as it may help with other kinds of problems.
On 10/17/05, Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apache Harmony Bootstrap JVM wrote:
> > For testing
Apache Harmony Bootstrap JVM wrote:
For testing threading, I think the simpler the better.
If Harmony contains a JIT, then it would probably be easy to
configure the JIT to insert "context switch" instruction(s)
between every two instructions it emits. Then we could write
tests that attempt to
05 5:40 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Changes to bootjvm 0.0.0 coming soon
Testing the java memory model, and hence threading, is really tricky
and all I can think right now is some testing stuff Doug Lea released
regarding to java.util.concurrent. What I know is that a test to be
w
e-
> From: Rodrigo Kumpera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Oct 17, 2005 3:26 PM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Changes to bootjvm 0.0.0 coming soon
>
> These are really good news Dan!
>
> I think we could start writing test code for the runtime fun
tor.apache.org
Subject: Re: Changes to bootjvm 0.0.0 coming soon
These are really good news Dan!
I think we could start writing test code for the runtime functionality
like proper null checks, array bounds, class initialization,
synchronization and such.
On 10/17/05, Apache Harmony Bootstrap JVM
These are really good news Dan!
I think we could start writing test code for the runtime functionality
like proper null checks, array bounds, class initialization,
synchronization and such.
On 10/17/05, Apache Harmony Bootstrap JVM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Everyone,
>
> I've been working h
Everyone,
I've been working hard on changes the bootjvm 0.0.0
code that I contributed recently. There have been a
number of valuable critiques, especially involving
portability issues. I have taken a hard look at these
and found a number of things that need adjustment,
plus some plain ol' bugs.
12 matches
Mail list logo
