Re: Deleted version_svn_tag.h

2006-11-14 Thread Salikh Zakirov
Nathan Beyer wrote: Not using SVN directly? Do I even want to ask? We have a running SVN-Git mirroring via tailor, and some people prefer to use Git for managing patches, because git 1) is faster 2) can manage many patches and branches 3) can work offline. (I do not intend this as hidden

Re: Deleted version_svn_tag.h

2006-11-14 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Salikh Zakirov wrote: Nathan Beyer wrote: Not using SVN directly? Do I even want to ask? We have a running SVN-Git mirroring via tailor, and some people prefer to use Git for managing patches, because git 1) is faster 2) can manage many patches and branches 3) can work offline. (I do not

Deleted version_svn_tag.h

2006-11-13 Thread Salikh Zakirov
Nathan Beyer wrote: I deleted the file and added it to the ignore property. For those of us poor souls not using SVN directly this deletion broke the build, as the file version_svn_tag.h is not available directly now. The issue HARMONY-2168 provides a fix: copy the file.

Re: Deleted version_svn_tag.h

2006-11-13 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Patch applied - please test Salikh Zakirov wrote: Nathan Beyer wrote: I deleted the file and added it to the ignore property. For those of us poor souls not using SVN directly this deletion broke the build, as the file version_svn_tag.h is not available directly now. The issue HARMONY-2168

Re: Deleted version_svn_tag.h

2006-11-13 Thread Nathan Beyer
Not using SVN directly? Do I even want to ask? In any case, I tested it after I deleted the file and the file was regenerated during the build. Did I miss something? I thought this bit was already in the scripts. -Nathan On 11/13/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Beyer wrote: