Thanks for your reply! And I agree that the right thing is to file
bugs on EUT. But maybe it is ok to make the patches first as a
temporary workaround just to be able to run EUT on Harmony and not to
wait too long for EUT bugs fixes? Does it make sense?
Thanks,
Nina
On 11/3/06, Alexey Varlamov
2006/11/7, Nina Rinskaya [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks for your reply! And I agree that the right thing is to file
bugs on EUT. But maybe it is ok to make the patches first as a
temporary workaround just to be able to run EUT on Harmony and not to
wait too long for EUT bugs fixes? Does it make
On the 0x215 day of Apache Harmony Nina Rinskaya wrote:
Hi,
I might have chosen the wrong thread for this message, but this is
about another well-known unit tests suite - Eclipse Unit Tests. I've
recently filed new JIRA issue
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2038) with the ant
+1 to integration. As for the patches, I'd rather suggest filing bugs
on EUT and let respective community to resolve those issue for good -
either find more universal approach (like java.management or JVMTI
features) or hardcode harmony too :).
Thanks for spending these efforts, anyway!
03 Nov
Hi,
I might have chosen the wrong thread for this message, but this is
about another well-known unit tests suite - Eclipse Unit Tests. I've
recently filed new JIRA issue
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2038) with the ant
script to run EUT on Harmony. Does it make sense to
Nice work!
Thanks, Vladimir
On 11/2/06, Nina Rinskaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I might have chosen the wrong thread for this message, but this is
about another well-known unit tests suite - Eclipse Unit Tests. I've
recently filed new JIRA issue
Leo Li wrote:
So I recommend to delay putting formal derby tests in Harmony project
util
they are ported to junit. Since there will be quite some trouble to build
them and to test them. Furthermore, current tests which are large and
compared by console output are not so easy for debugging.:)
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
What's the timeline? Can we help?
Hopefully within months, we already have a set of JUnit tests that run
successfully, now just need to convert the existing ~600 tests.
Conversion has started, and yes you are very welcome to help, just join
in on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Vladimir:
Sorry for the delay.
I am willing to share my script. It will be great if we can use real
application as a supplement for our testcase.
But...actually, I am not quite sure about what the script is.:)
On 10/25/06, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent!
On 10/26/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Vladimir:
Sorry for the delay.
I am willing to share my script. It will be great if we can use real
application as a supplement for our testcase.
But...actually, I am not quite sure about what the script is.:)
From my point of
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 10/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
snip
PS. The directory structure may be something like that:
builtest
- trunk
- cc
- coverage
- japi
- application_test
-
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Nice work!
More inline..
Leo Li wrote:
467 Tests Run
94% Pass (443 tests passed)
6% Fail (24 tests failed)
5 Suites skipped
The main progress focuses here:
1. Harmony classlib fails to load class when user-defined security policy
exists. It is due to the sequence of
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Derby is moving to a pure JUnit based world, so it is probably not worth
a lot of effort patching up the old harness to run with Harmony. One of
the reasons to kill the old harness is that how to run with a new vm is
not obvious.
No kidding ;-)
Tim Ellison wrote:
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Derby is moving to a pure JUnit based world, so it is probably not worth
a lot of effort patching up the old harness to run with Harmony. One of
the reasons to kill the old harness is that how to run with a new vm is
not obvious.
No kidding ;-)
What's the timeline? Can we help?
Tim Ellison wrote:
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Derby is moving to a pure JUnit based world, so it is probably not worth
a lot of effort patching up the old harness to run with Harmony. One of
the reasons to kill the old harness is that how to run with a new
I bet Mark could write a Perl script to do that...
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Derby is moving to a pure JUnit based world, so it is probably not worth
a lot of effort patching up the old harness to run with Harmony. One of
the reasons to kill
Excellent!
I have one more idea: we already have buildtest module. Some time ago we
agreed to extends it by coverage and japi scripts (I hope it happens soon:)
). May be we extend it one more time and store here some scripts for
automatic run of other-projects unit tests? Seems, in this case
On 25 October 2006 at 18:36, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent!
I have one more idea: we already have buildtest module. Some time ago we
agreed to extends it by coverage and japi scripts (I hope it happens soon:)
). May be we extend it one more time and store here some
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 25 October 2006 at 18:36, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent!
I have one more idea: we already have buildtest module. Some time ago we
agreed to extends it by coverage and japi scripts (I hope it happens soon:)
). May be we extend it one more time and
On 10/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
snip
PS. The directory structure may be something like that:
builtest
- trunk
- cc
- coverage
- japi
- application_test
- derby
- ant
Nice work!
More inline..
Leo Li wrote:
467 Tests Run
94% Pass (443 tests passed)
6% Fail (24 tests failed)
5 Suites skipped
The main progress focuses here:
1. Harmony classlib fails to load class when user-defined security policy
exists. It is due to the sequence of library loading of VM,
467 Tests Run
94% Pass (443 tests passed)
6% Fail (24 tests failed)
5 Suites skipped
The main progress focuses here:
1. Harmony classlib fails to load class when user-defined security policy
exists. It is due to the sequence of library loading of VM, which has been
resolved now.
2. A new
congratulations!
On 10/23/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
467 Tests Run
94% Pass (443 tests passed)
6% Fail (24 tests failed)
5 Suites skipped
The main progress focuses here:
1. Harmony classlib fails to load class when user-defined security policy
exists. It is due to the sequence of
Leo Li 写道:
467 Tests Run
94% Pass (443 tests passed)
6% Fail (24 tests failed)
5 Suites skipped
The main progress focuses here:
1. Harmony classlib fails to load class when user-defined security policy
exists. It is due to the sequence of library loading of VM, which has
been
resolved now.
2.
24 matches
Mail list logo
