Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools

2005-10-26 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Original Message] From: Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > Date: 10/26/05 4:10:38 AM Subject: Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools please, just check them in... don't worry too much about the polish :) gei

Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools

2005-10-26 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Hallelujah! On Oct 26, 2005, at 11:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Original Message] From: Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Date: 10/26/05 4:10:38 AM Subject: Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools please, just check them in... don't worry too muc

Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools

2005-10-26 Thread bootjvm
> [Original Message] > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Date: 10/26/05 4:10:38 AM > Subject: Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools > > please, just check them in... don't worry too much about the polish :) > > geir &

Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools

2005-10-26 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
pts (namely, '*/*.sh', being 'build.sh' and > > 'clean.sh' and 'common.sh') with these simple but _much_ > > smarter Makefiles (which run GNU make)? I'd be glad to > > polish up these files and stick them out on SVN if folks > > are

Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools

2005-10-26 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
s and stick them out on SVN if folks are interested. I am pretty sure that Rodrigo Kumpera and Robin Garner would be happy if I did so... ;-) Dan Lydick [Original Message] From: Tanuj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 10/25/05 9:29:49 AM Subject: Re:

Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools

2005-10-25 Thread Davanum Srinivas
clean.sh' and 'common.sh') with these simple but _much_ > smarter Makefiles (which run GNU make)? I'd be glad to > polish up these files and stick them out on SVN if folks > are interested. I am pretty sure that Rodrigo Kumpera and > Robin Garner would be happy if I d

Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools

2005-10-25 Thread bootjvm
y if I did so... ;-) Dan Lydick > [Original Message] > From: Tanuj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 10/25/05 9:29:49 AM > Subject: Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools > > The Boost project [http://www.boost.org] c

Re: MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools

2005-10-24 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
Supporting many compilers have a few problems, the three I can think of right now are, assembly sintax (intel x at&t), compiler extensions (gcc's computed goto can speed interpreters a lot) and c++ libraries nuanses (iff c++ is used). On 10/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

MSVC support, was: Compilers and configuration tools

2005-10-24 Thread bootjvm
Tanuj, Welcome! Thank you for your observations about compiler support. I tried to write my code so as to be as independent of a particular operating system and a particular compiler as possible, so I hope that compiling for MSVC is a simple matter. As far as whether we should move in that dire