Re: [classlib][logging] Best practices for logging within the Class Library?

Nathan Beyer wrote: -Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim Ellison wrote: We did this topic already it's even referenced from the website [1]. So at the risk of repeating my super-super-duper high level view... Why are we considering putting log

RE: [classlib][logging] Best practices for logging within the Class Library?

> -Original Message- > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Tim Ellison wrote: > > We did this topic already it's even referenced from the website > > [1]. So at the risk of repeating my super-super-duper high level > view... > > > > Why are we considering putting logg

Re: [classlib][logging] Best practices for logging within the Class Library?

Tim Ellison wrote: We did this topic already it's even referenced from the website [1]. So at the risk of repeating my super-super-duper high level view... Why are we considering putting logging into the class library implementation? Darn it! I was hoping that I could beat you to this, b

Re: [classlib][logging] Best practices for logging within the Class Library?

Well, I still think that logging is useful sometimes. Is it for our end-users? Do we expect them to turn on logging and look at the contents to discover problems in our code? or perhaps discover problems in their usage of the API? Both of these seem like flawed concepts. Yes, exactly. For en

Re: [classlib][logging] Best practices for logging within the Class Library?

We did this topic already it's even referenced from the website [1]. So at the risk of repeating my super-super-duper high level view... Why are we considering putting logging into the class library implementation? Is it for our end-users? Do we expect them to turn on logging and look at the