RE: [classlib] generics puzzler (was: Re: Thanks Stepan! (was: Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-454) [classlib][luni] java.util.Set generics uplift and related changes))

2006-05-31 Thread Nathan Beyer
, 2006 6:59 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Thanks Stepan! (was: Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-454) [classlib][luni] java.util.Set generics uplift and related changes) Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote: snip 2) To avoid casting while-loop was replaced with for-loop

[classlib] generics puzzler (was: Re: Thanks Stepan! (was: Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-454) [classlib][luni] java.util.Set generics uplift and related changes))

2006-05-11 Thread Tim Ellison
in Eclipse is to the annotation: @SuppressWarnings(unchecked). -Nathan -Original Message- From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:59 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Thanks Stepan! (was: Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-454

Thanks Stepan! (was: Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-454) [classlib][luni] java.util.Set generics uplift and related changes)

2006-05-10 Thread Tim Ellison
Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote: snip 2) To avoid casting while-loop was replaced with for-loop. Could you review the change? I was scratching my head about this cast, so I was very pleased to see your elegant solution. I must admit that I don't really understand why the for-loop version is

RE: Thanks Stepan! (was: Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-454) [classlib][luni] java.util.Set generics uplift and related changes)

2006-05-10 Thread Nathan Beyer
(unchecked). -Nathan -Original Message- From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:59 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Thanks Stepan! (was: Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-454) [classlib][luni] java.util.Set generics uplift and related

Re: Thanks Stepan! (was: Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-454) [classlib][luni] java.util.Set generics uplift and related changes)

2006-05-10 Thread Stepan Mishura
On 5/10/06, Tim Ellison wrote: Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote: snip 2) To avoid casting while-loop was replaced with for-loop. Could you review the change? I was scratching my head about this cast, so I was very pleased to see your elegant solution. I must admit that I don't really understand