Hello:
It seems to me we live in America and one can donate his/her money to anyone.
Why don't they get off Friedman's case? He's damned if he does and damned
if he doesn't.
Shabbat Shalom!
Elaine Goldman
==
HaSafran -
I wish I could agree, but the target of the piece is clearly Friedman. But
the path by which she gets to her conclusion is so tortured that whatever
freight she sees has been dumped by the roadside long before then:
Friedman donates to a shul library; that shul is Conservative; it's part of
the
Shalom all--this is very disturbing--but not surprising-- coming from
the Voice.
Cotts really doesn't criticize Friedman that much--after all--he can
donate his money to whomever he chooses. She seems to especially take
issue with Kol Shalom's rabbi and his relationship to financial
matters, but
3 matches
Mail list logo
