This is my third resend of this message. Previous (partial?) failures
appear to be due to that "reply" cannot be used and/or MIME attachments
cannot be used. Apologies to anyone seeing this message for the
umteenth time. (And this is the *only* mailing list that I have trouble
with...)
>
> Karl-Filip Faxen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There is a hidden cost to trapping Int overflow ...
> > operations on Ints become unsafe i.e. may raise exceptions
> > This is a problem both for a global
> > instruction scheduler (e.g. a trace scheduler) and for other
> > optimi
At 10:11 -0500 97/10/29, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
>Just as a note, the computer architecture folks have designed support
>for speculative execution in the presence of exception-causing
>instructions. The idea, as embodied, for example, in the
>Hewlett-Packard Playdoh architecture, is that there i
