On 09-Nov-1998, S. Alexander Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 7 Nov 1998, Fergus Henderson wrote:
But if we have to add new syntax to make it work then it
is getting to be more trouble than its worth.
Since the application is code generation, I don't think the extra
syntax is a
2. Does the new GHC support TREX? If yes, how does one enable it?
TREX is Mark and Ben's excellent record system for Haskell.
No, GHC doesn't support it. I'd be interested to know how
high a priority adding TREX would be to GHC users.
Simon
Hi Alex,
| 1. Does hugs now support mutually recursive modules?
As far as I know, there are no versions of Hugs that support this.
The underlying infrastructure in the Hugs implementation was never
designed with this in mind, and would need some substantial changes.
There is interest in doing
I really don't like the fact that the unary "-" is special in Haskell.
I propose that along with infix operators, Haskell support prefix and
postfix operators. The negative function could be renamed to, randomly,
%-.
I also suggest that the operators be divided into categories, and their
names
I have been reading about the integrated runtime system
between GHC and
Hugs. Now that GHC 4.0 is out, what is the status of the hugs ghc
integration project?
1. Does hugs now support mutually recursive modules?
Initially it'll have limited support for mutually recursive compiled
ANNOUNCEMENT AND CALL FOR PAPERS
WAAAPL'99
The First Workshop on Algorithmic Aspects of Advanced Programming Languages
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~cdo/waaapl.html
Paris, France
