Re: y2k compliance

Adrian Hey wrote: > On Wed 09 Jun, Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote: > > ... and , if you are already here,... > > could somebody explain, please, what does it mean to have a compiler > > which is *NOT* y2k compliant, > > I have found that some compilers put the date and time of compilation in the > re

Re: how to write a simple cat

Hannah Schroeter wrote: > > Hello! > > On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 12:18:31PM +0200, Friedrich Dominicus wrote: > > > [...] > > > > splitFilterMap unSplitFn afterMap filterPredicate beforeMap splitFn = > > > unSplitFn . map afterMap . filter filterPredicate . map beforeMap . splitFn > > [...] >

Re: how to write a simple cat

Hannah Schroeter wrote: > > Hello! > > On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 12:29:45PM +0200, Friedrich Dominicus wrote: > > [...] > > > > What is difficult is that by using some predefined function, one can > > > express very much in very small code. I believe Haskell is even more > > > expressive than mos

Re: y2k compliance

On Wed 09 Jun, Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote: > ... and , if you are already here,... > could somebody explain, please, what does it mean to have a compiler > which is *NOT* y2k compliant, I have found that some compilers put the date and time of compilation in the resulting object files, so it is po

y2k compliance

Hi I would like to know whether haskell compilers (hugs, hbc and lmlc) are fuly y2k compliant. Can anyone fill me in on this? Thanks Hugo -- Dr Hugo Bouckaert - Systems Administrator, Computer Science UWA Tel: +(61 8) 9380 2878 / Fax: +(61 8) 9380 1089 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Web: http://ww

Re: how to write a simple cat

Hello! On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 01:29:12AM -0700, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > [...] > - Would people actually add stuff? I'm a bit skeptical, but it would >be great to have my skepticism proved unfounded. I think, Friedrich and those who helped him could have posted their questions and

Re: how to write a simple cat

Hello! On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 12:29:45PM +0200, Friedrich Dominicus wrote: > [...] > > What is difficult is that by using some predefined function, one can > > express very much in very small code. I believe Haskell is even more > > expressive than most OO languages with comparable libraries >

Re: how to write a simple cat

Hello! On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 12:18:31PM +0200, Friedrich Dominicus wrote: > [...] > > splitFilterMap unSplitFn afterMap filterPredicate beforeMap splitFn = > > unSplitFn . map afterMap . filter filterPredicate . map beforeMap . splitFn > [...] > sorry this looks morre terrible to me than a

RE: y2k compliance

Hi Hugo, | I would like to know whether haskell compilers (hugs, hbc and lmlc) are | fuly y2k compliant. Can anyone fill me in on this? My understanding is that none of the current Haskell implementors can afford to answer a question like this because none of us have the developer, support, or l

Re: y2k compliance

Hugo Bouckaert wrote: > I would like to know whether haskell compilers (hugs, hbc and lmlc) are > fuly y2k compliant. Can anyone fill me in on this? ... and , if you are already here,... could somebody explain, please, what does it mean to have a compiler which is *NOT* y2k compliant, what is t

digits of large integer

Anatoli Tubman wrote: T> How can I *efficiently* print (i.e. find the decimal, or in T> general N-ary, representation of) large Integers, like factorial of 1? Lennart Augustsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied A> Use hbc? It uses the gmp routine to convert an Integer to a String. A> Converti

Re: Language Feature Request: String Evaluation

S. Alexander Jacobson writes: > In principle I can do this, but: > 1. how do I hide the import of show String to replace it w/ my own? > 2. If I do replce show String what else will break? I'd rather let the preprocessor insert calls to eshow, and leave show as it is. > 3. If instead I defin

RE: Language Feature Request: String Evaluation

> In principle I can do this, but: > 1. how do I hide the import of show String to replace it w/ my own? > 2. If I do replce show String what else will break? > 3. If instead I define an eshow function that strips "", how do I minimize > the perforamnce hit of quote stripping? > 4. If I want to sh