I believe I've fixed the foreign export problems now, at least the examples
I've tried now work. However, this is a fairly large change so it may need
a couple of days to settle down.
Cheers,
Simon
They should not.
--
__("Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/ GCS/M d- s+:-- a22 C+++$ UL++$ P+++ L++$ E-
^^ W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP+ t
QRCZAK 5? X- R tv-- b+++ DI D- G+ e h!
Hello!
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 11:29:33PM -0800, Nick Eby wrote:
Why is ghc not recognizing prelude functions, specifically isLower,
toLower, and isUpper? When compiling, i get the message
Variable not in scope: 'isLower'
Look at the Haskell report. There's no isLower/toLower/isUpper in
Sparc users in particular: I've identified some recent breakage in the
Sparc port of GHC. If you've been experiencing crashes in binaries
generated by a compiler built from recent (at least February) sources, then
I've checked in a fix which might help.
George, Marc: this probably fixes to the
Simon Marlow wrote:
Sparc users in particular: I've identified some recent breakage in the
Sparc port of GHC. If you've been experiencing crashes in binaries
generated by a compiler built from recent (at least February) sources, then
I've checked in a fix which might help.
George,
Simon Marlow wrote:
Sparc users in particular: I've identified some recent breakage in the
Sparc port of GHC. If you've been experiencing crashes in binaries
generated by a compiler built from recent (at least February) sources, then
I've checked in a fix which might help.
George,
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
Shouldn't foreign exported names be allowed to be qualified?
IMHO not:
module Foo where
Foo.f = "This is not allowed, either."
I've just accidentally reused a Prelude name for a function to be
foreign exported and could not resolve the conflict with
F I R S T C A L L F O RP A R T I C I P A T I O N
~~
International Summer School on Computational Logic
ISCL 2000
There has been a great deal of mail about overlapping
instances. I confess that I have read little of it.
But I am interested in it.
Would someone like to write a summary of
what the issues are
what people agree about
what they disagree
Dear Haskellites,
http://www.haskell.org/ now has a mirror site in the U.K:
The HASKELL mirror is now live at the UK Mirror Service at
http://www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/www.haskell.org/ and will
feature in this months
newsletter announcing new mirrors at the end of the month. We
would be
1.)
Does anybody know of (a set of) combinators describing the data flow
through functions? The most prominent representative in this resepct
is probably composition ('.' in Haskell).
2.)
In
http://members.aol.com/lawsofform/
I read the following:
Hopkins, 1994
Hopkins, M.
To bring the intellectual tone down a notch or two from that
"overlapping instances" thread ...
I've just spent spent a few hours tearing my hair out trying to work
out why my code was giving different answers under hugs and under ghc.
Eventually I found that ghc was ignoring fixity
On 08-Mar-2000, Simon Peyton-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There has been a great deal of mail about overlapping
instances. I confess that I have read little of it.
But I am interested in it.
Would someone like to write a summary of
what the issues are
Simon Peyton-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 8 Mar 2000
There has been a great deal of mail about overlapping
instances. I confess that I have read little of it.
But I am interested in it.
Would someone like to write a summary of
what the issues are
14 matches
Mail list logo
