My ghc compiler produced a message, that suggests you want to know that it
has occured. Here is a verbatim of what happened:
VERBATIM
c:\Atlasghc -package text -H16m RoseItems.lhs
ghc: panic! (the `impossible' happened, GHC version 5.02.2):
stack overflow
Please report it as a
There seems to be a problem with the source tar.bz2 distribution of the
5.03 snapshot. The web page claims it's 5.3M, but the actualy file is
only 4117517 bytes and doesn't untar properly:
x ghc-5.03.20020204/ghc/InstallShield/Setup Files/Compressed Files, 0
bytes, 0 tape blocks
x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm interested in doing a port of GHC to OS/2.
Any particular documentation I should be reading before I even think about
embarking on such a crazy endevour?
- --
Russell O'Connor[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I built quite a big library and turned it into a package. It works fine if
use ghc -package gtk2 Blah.hs to compile things. But when I convert all
the libraries to object files as described in the documentation, GHCi
refuses to load the whole machinery:
~/source/mogul/fpDemo:$ ghci -package
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Simon Marlow wrote:
../../ghc/utils/ghc-pkg/ghc-pkg-inplace --update-package
lang.conf.inplace
Reading package info from stdin... done.
Expanding embedded variables...done.
dependency `base' doesn't exist
make[2]: *** [boot] Error 1
make[1]: *** [boot] Error 1
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
That's what I did. It made ghc ok, but then when it tries the 'make
boot' in hslibs it falls over. The same happens if I change into
$(BUILD)/hslibs and do 'make boot'...
Ok, I've worked out the problem: I just checked out the modules ghc
One of the new features of the latest snapshot of GHC
is that :
"The type system now supports arbitrary rank
polymorphism, given appropriate type annotations."
Could you point me to some literature on this feature
and how it is used?
I'm familiar with rank-2 polymorphic types. I
am not
Hi
I'm building some stuff here that is basically a glorified and
specialized version of quicksort. It is very quick, and works like a
charm for my purposes, except that it consumes way too much space,
about 100 bytes times the size of the input list. Which means that,
for my data sets, the
Hi,
I'd like to know if there's any Hugs compatible library with
functionalities to send mail.
I don't think so. If all you want to do is send mail from within an haskell
program why not just make system calls. I did something like that a long time
ago. I've sent you the
To meet Ian's observation below, I propose to replace the
lexical production
newline - a newline (system dependent)
by
newline - return linefeed | return | linefeed
which, given maximal munch, will behave decently on
any normal system.
Any objections?
Simon
|
Dear reader,
I'm pleased to announce the availability of a release of the Haskell module
for JCreator. You can get it, as usual, at
http://www.students.cs.uu.nl/people/rjchaaft/JCreator
The previous update lacks the documentation tool, and is quite restrictive
concerning the location of Hugs,
Does anybody with their elbows in the
code think variable interpolation and/or
multi-line strings are good/doable ideas?
Would this be the sort of change one could make
without a lot of previous familiarity with
the implementation of Hugs/Ghc?
It would be a *signifigant* boon to those
of us
How should I modify the function below so that characters
are printed
out as they arrive?
printchar :: Handle - IO ()
printchar handle = do c - hGetChar handle
putChar c
Try using
hSetBuffering handle NoBuffering
hSetBuffering stdout
From: Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody with their elbows in the
code think variable interpolation and/or
multi-line strings are good/doable ideas?
Can't say I have my elbows in the code, but I think that
multi-line strings could be useful. I'm not sure what I
think about variable
Does anybody with their elbows in the
code think variable interpolation and/or
multi-line strings are good/doable ideas?
Would this be the sort of change one could make
without a lot of previous familiarity with
the implementation of Hugs/Ghc?
It would be a *signifigant* boon to those
of
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, David Feuer wrote:
It would be a *signifigant* boon to those
of us trying to get haskell into organizations
by using it as maintainable perl/sh, and
Haskell is not a maintainable perl/sh. It is not a good
language for simple shell scripts, and is not good for
On 12 Feb 2002, Pixel wrote:
eurk
ERROR /usr/share/hugs/lib/exts/ST.hs:48 - Syntax error in type expression
(unexpected `.')
isn't there a way ST.hs would require the extensions? a pragma or something?
someone not knowing the -98 would wonder for a long time about what to do
:-(
That
On Wednesday 13 February 2002 06:36 am, C.Reinke wrote:
Does anybody with their elbows in the
code think variable interpolation and/or
multi-line strings are good/doable ideas?
Would this be the sort of change one could make
without a lot of previous familiarity with
the
hugs and ghc. With hugs, I use the builtin feature, of course. With GHC, we
just use a pre-processor. This is a bit awkward with GHC 5.02 and earlier
versions, but starting with 5.03, GHC now has a proper interface for hooking
in a pre-processor (don't know the details, bug Sigbjorn
19 matches
Mail list logo
