On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:26:04PM +0100, Mauricio Carvalho wrote:
> module MyModule where
> foreign export ccall "fac" fac :: Int -> Int
> fac :: Int -> Int
> fac n
> | n <= 0 = 1
> | otherwise = n * fac(n-1)
> It gave me 4 files: MyModule_stub.h, MyModule_stub.c, MyModule_stub.o, MyModul
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:08:50 +0800 (GMT-8)
Martin Sulzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me know what you think
> would be useful and we try to make it available in the next release.
Maybe "extensions" was an excess :) I just want to point out, in my
little student experience, that a new lang
Curly enough...
Thanks,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Hal Daume III
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:40 PM
To: David Bergman
Cc: 'Haskell Mailing List'
Subject: RE: "cartesian classes"
> A very concrete, but naïve, question: w
> A very concrete, but naïve, question: what is the syntax for defining
> functional dependencies in Hugs and GHC? Since Mark Jones' syntax was
> abstract in his paper, it is kind of hard to deduce an ASCII equivalence
> (I have tried to figure out how to create a curly arrow from the
> keyboard ;-
(I am having problem with my lovely Outlook program, so here I send it
again, to the whole group; sorry, Frank...)
Frank Atanassow wrote:
> David Bergman wrote (on 26-11-02 01:29 -0500):
>> I would like to know if anyone (maybe Mark P) knows the status of
>> "Cartesian classes" in different Has
Hi
I need help specifically building Haskell functions
that I can call from C++ (or C).
I looked at the Foreign Function Interface
explanation at GHC user's guide, but I didn't understand itt well, and I'm not
succeeding at doing it.
I'm using GCH 5.04.1 in Win32 environment, and
Microsoft
> > What does "nub" stand for? (This is the first I've heard of it.)
> Hmm, maybe that's not such a great explanation. I wonder who can come up
> with the best acronym? My contribution is
>
> "Note Unique Bits"
"no duplicates" (or "no doubles") although that's no acronym
Christian
__
+---+
EACL 2003
10th Conference of the European Chapter
of the Association for Computational Linguistics
April 12-17, 2003
Bud
Nick Name writes:
> > The latest Chamleon release includes a compiler. Chameleon programs
> > are translated into plain Haskell (= Hindley/Milner subset plus
> > polymorphic recursion).
>
> Do this mean I can use all of the ghc extensions and the chameleon type
> system in my programs?
>
David Bergman wrote (on 26-11-02 01:29 -0500):
> I would like to know if anyone (maybe Mark P) knows the status of
> "Cartesian classes" in different Haskell implementations. I.e., does
> anyone implement the suggested functional dependencies or the less
> general parameterized type classes?
>
> I
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:54:08 +0800 (GMT-8)
Martin Sulzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The latest Chamleon release includes a compiler. Chameleon programs
> are translated into plain Haskell (= Hindley/Milner subset plus
> polymorphic recursion).
Do this mean I can use all of the ghc exten
11 matches
Mail list logo