Re: [Haskell] definition of intersperse

2004-03-03 Thread Daan Leijen
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:59:48 -0800, Iavor S. Diatchki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i'd like to suggest that the definition of "intersperse" from the List module be made more lazy. Good thing, I think that library functions should always be as lazy as possible in their observeable interface (or well d

Re: [Haskell] Announce: wxHaskell 0.6

2004-03-03 Thread Gour
Daan Leijen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi Daan! > This new release fixes many bugs, adds basic support for MDI > applications and compiles with the latest CVS snapshots of wxWidgets. > For now, only an installer for windows is provided. Thank you very much for your cosntant work on wxHaskell. I

Re: [Haskell] Announce: wxHaskell 0.6

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Walton
Gour wrote: Daan Leijen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi Daan! This new release fixes many bugs, adds basic support for MDI applications and compiles with the latest CVS snapshots of wxWidgets. For now, only an installer for windows is provided. Thank you very much for your cosntant work on wxHa

Re: [Haskell] Announce: wxHaskell 0.6

2004-03-03 Thread Gour
Pls. excuse me for cross-posting - my mistake :-( -- Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Linux User #278493 ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: [wxhaskell-users] Re: [Haskell] Announce: wxHaskell 0.6

2004-03-03 Thread Gour
Matthew Walton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Plenty of ebuilds seem to work from multiple source packages... I can't > see a particular difficulty in writing one that installs wxHaskell > source and documentation simultaneously. Thank you for pointing this out. I never came across one. I was pl

Re: [wxhaskell-users] Re: [Haskell] Announce: wxHaskell 0.6

2004-03-03 Thread Daan Leijen
Dear Gour, On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:58:53 +0100, Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (Again), I have one suggestion for wxHaskell: to combine doc & src packages into one - wxhaskell-x-xx. The documentation is generated from the source, so there is no need to include it. Furthermore, the binary releases i

Re: [wxhaskell-users] Re: [Haskell] Announce: wxHaskell 0.6

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Walton
Gour wrote: Matthew Walton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Plenty of ebuilds seem to work from multiple source packages... I can't see a particular difficulty in writing one that installs wxHaskell source and documentation simultaneously. Thank you for pointing this out. I never came across one.

[Haskell] Postdoc in program development, analysis and transformation

2004-03-03 Thread Wim Vanhoof
(apologies for multiple copies) Dear all, I would like to announce that the department of computer science of the University of Namur, Belgium, is seeking a post-doctoral researcher for a one-year fellowship in the area of (logic-based) program development, analysis and transformation.

Re: [Haskell]

2004-03-03 Thread Koji Nakahara
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:52:46 + Alastair Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -- snip > > Maybe we can have both sets of operations? This could be done either using > two separate Array types or by having two variants of a few of the array ops. Nice. I personally have not needed that check yet, b

[Haskell] ANNOUNCE: HaskellDB 0.6

2004-03-03 Thread Anders Höckersten
We are pleased to announce the second alpha release of our "remake" of HaskellDB, version 0.6. The main feature of this release is our implementation of bounded lists, which may even be interesting outside of HaskellDB. Read on below for more information about it. HaskellDB is a Haskell library

Re: [Haskell] Per-type function namespaces (was: Data.Set whishes)

2004-03-03 Thread Andre Pang
On 28/02/2004, at 1:30 AM, Per Larsson wrote: In my humble opionon explicit module prefixes are a feature, which enhance code clarity, and not something you want get rid of using rather complex namespace extensions. However, as Alastair Reid's mail in this thread indicates there are weaknesses i

Re: [Haskell] Per-type function namespaces (was: Data.Set whishes)

2004-03-03 Thread Andre Pang
On 28/02/2004, at 3:26 AM, David Bergman wrote: Writing "function expression ..." would work too, but then it looks like a standard function call rather than a function call associated with a particular type, and I think that causes more confusion. Long-time Haskell users understand that writing "