naesten:
> On 26/05/05, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > lambdabot was written by Andrew Bromage, and is now a community
> > project. lambdabot 3.0 would not have been possible without the help of
> > the #haskell irc community -- this release features more than 450
> > patches f
On 26/05/05, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lambdabot was written by Andrew Bromage, and is now a community
> project. lambdabot 3.0 would not have been possible without the help of
> the #haskell irc community -- this release features more than 450
> patches from 14 contributors
I'm pleased to announce the release of lambdabot 3.0.
lambdabot is a stable, feature rich IRC bot based on a dynamic plugin
framework. 98% of lambdabot is dynamically loaded over a static core.
Lambdabot also features persistent state -- knowledge accumulated during
an irc session is not lost if
Marnix Klooster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> One can start with just storing the darcs repository (-ies) for a
> project on SF, and export it through SF's web space. You could also run
> darcs.cgi there, for just viewing patches. And you can easily put your
> own darcs binary on an SF server, so
On 26/05/05, Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Samuel Bronson wrote:
> > The thing is, Haskell people tend to want to use Darcs for their
> > Haskell stuff, and I don't think there are sites like sourceforge
> > supporting it yet...
>
> So my question is (probably once again): Why can >100.0
On 26/05/05, Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/25/05, Samuel Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The thing is, Haskell people tend to want to use Darcs for their
> > Haskell stuff, and I don't think there are sites like sourceforge
> > supporting it yet...
>
> I tried to address thi
On 5/25/05, Samuel Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21/05/05, Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/13/05, Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If we take a look on new HCAR, we can see that many Haskell projects are
> > > scattered all around, so it would be nice to have them on
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:25:48PM +0200,
Marnix Klooster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 62 lines which said:
> One can start with just storing the darcs repository (-ies) for a
> project on SF, and export it through SF's web space.
It is not very convenient and:
> And you can easily
Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So my question is (probably once again): Why can >100.000 projects
> live with SF and not the Haskell community? Although CVS is not my
> favourite version control system, I'd happily use it if I get the
> rest of SF for free then.
For Hackage, we probably
'lo all,
Note that (1) SourceForge does not require use of CVS; and (2) darcs
needs no special SourceForge configuration/tools to be usable.
One can start with just storing the darcs repository (-ies) for a
project on SF, and export it through SF's web space. You could also run
darcs.cgi there,
Samuel Bronson wrote:
The thing is, Haskell people tend to want to use Darcs for their
Haskell stuff, and I don't think there are sites like sourceforge
supporting it yet...
So my question is (probably once again): Why can >100.000 projects
live with SF and not the Haskell community? Although C
11 matches
Mail list logo
