[Sorry for the duplicate, I tried to submit this through the trac
interface but the formatting was destroyed by trac so I'm emailing it
in hopes that it preserves some formatting.]
Trying to build gtk2hs-0.9.10 on win32 using ghc 6.5 (the ghc that
ships with visual haskell).
output of ghc -v5:
'check' isn't in any public version of GHC just yet. We have the code,
but have not yet gotten it into the main darcs repository. Sorry.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Behalf Of S Koray Can
| Sent: 13 July 2006 03:13
| To:
Thanks for your reply. I'm a bit confused, however. There is a
function
check :: Bool - STM a in the STM library, but it appears to act
differently than the one described in the paper. This version of check
seems to cause a transaction to block when its (check's) first argument
is False,
Hello Chris,
Thursday, July 13, 2006, 1:03:19 AM, you wrote:
This was my first time packaging with cabal, and I am hoping it works for you.
are you included Makefile? this makes building installation somewhat
simpler for a user
Question 2: Is there interest in getting this into an official
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Chris,
Thursday, July 13, 2006, 1:03:19 AM, you wrote:
This was my first time packaging with cabal, and I am hoping it works for you.
are you included Makefile? this makes building installation somewhat
simpler for a user
Yes, but the makefile is used just to
On 13 Jul 2006, at 06:25, Jared Warren wrote:
Haskell's type checking language is a logical programming language.
The canonical logical language is Prolog. However, Idealised Prolog
does not have data structures, and does Peano numbers like:
natural(zero).
natural(x), succ(x,y) :-
Greetings fellow Haskellers,
As you may or may not know, the great folks at Microsoft Research are
interviewing people from the end of this month to the 11th of August.
In light of this event, I hereby call attention to the AngloHaskell
gathering: http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/AngloHaskell
Hello Donald,
Thursday, July 13, 2006, 9:33:34 AM, you wrote:
Why can't Haskell (with extensions) do type-level Peano naturals in
the same fashion? The code would be something like:
darcs get --partial --tag '0.1' http://www.eecs.tufts.edu/~rdocki01/typenats/
--
Best regards,
Bulat
Chad Scherrer wrote:
I'm interested in attending the Hackathon, but I don't have
anyprevious experience working on compilers.
One book I'm reading right now is Modern Compiler Implementation in ML
(http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~appel/modern/ml/). The author writes a
compiler of increasing
Hi Daniel,
R.C. Read, R.E. Tarjan. Bounds on Backtrack Algorithms for Listing
Cycles, Paths and Spanning Trees. Networks 5: 237-252, 1975,
section 8.3, Cycles, of
Edward M. Reingold, Jurg Nievergelt, Narsing Deo. Combinatorial
Algorithms: Theory and Practice. Prentice-Hall, Englewood
Martin Percossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another question regarding the hackathon: will anyone be video taping
the presentations? I live in europe and travel will be prohibitive: it
would be nice if the presentations where mpeg'd and dumped onto the
haskell website so that anyone can
Hello Jeremy,
Wednesday, July 12, 2006, 10:43:22 PM, you wrote:
I'm interested in attending the Hackathon, but I don't have any previous
experience working on compilers.
Perhaps we should start a list of pre-session recommended reading on
the wiki page? I would recommend at least skimming
On 7/13/06, Jared Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haskell's type checking language is a logical programming language.
The canonical logical language is Prolog. However, Idealised Prolog
does not have data structures, and does Peano numbers like:
natural(zero).
natural(x), succ(x,y) :-
On 2006-07-13 at 02:29BST Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
Are cool kids supposed to put the comma in front like this?
Some cool kids do, some cool kids don't. Some do both, depending on their
mood.
The advantage of a leading , is that now the comma's line up, and if
you want to add an item on
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Jon Fairbairn wrote:
On 2006-07-13 at 02:29BST Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
Are cool kids supposed to put the comma in front like this?
Some cool kids do, some cool kids don't. Some do both, depending on their
mood.
The advantage of a leading , is that now the
On 2006-07-12 at 23:24BST Brian Hulley wrote:
Christian Maeder wrote:
Donald Bruce Stewart schrieb:
Question over whether it should be:
splitBy (=='a') aabbaca == [,,bb,c,]
or
splitBy (=='a') aabbaca == [bb,c]
I argue the second form is what people usually want.
Yes,
On 2006-07-13 at 11:15+0200 Henning Thielemann wrote:
Optimal notation of lists, because of most easiest editing, is
a:
b:
c:
[]
That made me smile. In Ponder I had used up : for types, and
lists could be
a::
b::
c:.
but when I suggested this at a Haskell meeting, Simon PJ
complained
On 12 July 2006 16:12, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Simon,
Wednesday, July 12, 2006, 6:28:55 PM, you wrote:
like to be able to say the following: Cabal, find and use package X
if it exists. Furthermore, when CPPing source code, set a #define
HAS_PACKAGE_X so I can do conditional
Hello Simon,
Thursday, July 13, 2006, 1:40:22 PM, you wrote:
I have some changes to Cabal partly finished that will address this.
Don't worry, it's coming.
thanks, i will be glad to see it. but it will be GHC66-only?
No, just a new version of Cabal, which will work with 6.4.x.
anyway it
On 13 July 2006 11:27, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Simon,
Thursday, July 13, 2006, 1:40:22 PM, you wrote:
I have some changes to Cabal partly finished that will address
this. Don't worry, it's coming.
thanks, i will be glad to see it. but it will be GHC66-only?
No, just a new
Hi,
to start off, I'm using ldap-haskell straight from its darcs
repo under GHC-6.4.1, and it works. Just not quite like I
want.
First, I can't make a static compile:
$ ghc --make prog.hs -o prog
works without a warning, while
$ ghc --make prog.hs -o prog -optl -static
[...]
Jon Fairbairn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a::
b::
c:.
but when I suggested this at a Haskell meeting, Simon PJ
complained that it looks like hopscotch. I've never quite
understood that complaint!
http://blogs.salon.com/0002296/myimages/hopscotch.jpg and
On 2006-07-13 at 09:35EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark T.B. Carroll) wrote:
Jon Fairbairn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a::
b::
c:.
but when I suggested this at a Haskell meeting, Simon PJ
complained that it looks like hopscotch. I've never quite
understood that complaint!
On Jul 12, 2006, at 9:18 PM, Joel Reymont wrote:
Are cool kids supposed to put the comma in front like this?
, foo
, bar
, baz
Is this for historical or other reasons because Emacs formats
Haskell code well enough regardless.
Thanks, Joel
I personally like this style. It's a
Jared Warren wrote:
Haskell's type checking language is a logical programming language.
The canonical logical language is Prolog.
Why can't Haskell (with extensions) do type-level Peano naturals in
the same fashion? The code would be something like:
Also of possible interest, _Fun with
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:08:02PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
I believe that it the simplest way for programmer. But is that the
best way for users? i want to make building/installation as simple as
possible using Cabal infrastructure. is it possible that some box will
have Cabal, but not
I fail to see why the types Day and Month in System.Time are instances
of Bounded.
In my world there is no last day and the successor of Saturday is
Sunday -- not an exception! :)
I would like to believe there is a good reason for this boundedness,
but I can't see it.
On Jul 12, 2006, at 9:18 PM, Joel Reymont wrote:
Are cool kids supposed to put the comma in front like this?
, foo
, bar
, baz
Is this for historical or other reasons because Emacs formats Haskell
code well enough regardless.
Thanks, Joel
These layouts feel a bit artificial to
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:01:23AM +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote:
There might be issues with tuples though, for example (1,2,) would be
the (,) tuple and not the (,,) tuple, which is a bit weird.
Besides, it might be a bit more natural if (1,2,) was a shorthand for
(\x - (1,2,x))
Best regards
29 matches
Mail list logo
