DrIFT 2.2.1 is out and now has support for the Data.Binary module.
The old 'Binary' has been moved to 'BitsBinary' and 'Binary' now refers
to the new 'Data.Binary' version of the library.
the homepage is at:
http://repetae.net/~john/computer/haskell/DrIFT/
the current list of deriving rules it k
dons:
>
> Binary: high performance, pure binary serialisation for Haskell
> --
>
> The Binary Strike Team is pleased to announce the release of a new,
> pure, efficient binary serialisation library for Haskell, now
Binary: high performance, pure binary serialisation for Haskell
--
The Binary Strike Team is pleased to announce the release of a new,
pure, efficient binary serialisation library for Haskell, now available
from Hac
Hi,
I recently re-ran most of the benchmarks after we changed the following:
A couple of things I changed recently on the shootout are:
1. I reran the various tests using higher 'N' values to force more work to be
done.
2. I upgraded to the most recent GHC avaliable through Debian.
3. I don'
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 06:18:01PM +, Neil Mitchell wrote:
> Maybe if we had a greater number and variety of optimising compilers
> we'd be able to more freely experiment with optimisation techniques in
> different settings. At the moment GHC is all there is (with Jhc not
> ready for mainstream
On 1/25/07, John Meacham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:55:37AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Clean has also declined in these benchmarks but not that much as Haskell.
> According to John van Groningen Clean's binary-trees program in the previous
> shootout version used lazy
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:55:37AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Clean has also declined in these benchmarks but not that much as Haskell.
> According to John van Groningen Clean's binary-trees program in the previous
> shootout version used lazy data structure which resulted in lower memory
> usage
(Simon and Andy, if you guys got this twice, sorry about the double
mail)
On 25 Jan 2007, at 09:55, Simon Marlow wrote:
Forwarding on behalf of Andrzej Jaworski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Original Message
From: Andrzej Jaworski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Perhaps making a collective
[Sorry to spam you, but I got the URL wrong. Darn!]
Many of you will know that Paul Hudak, John Hughes, Phil Wadler and I have been
working on a paper called
A History of Haskell: being lazy with class
which will appear at this year's ACM SIGPLAN History of Programming Languages
Confe
Many of you will know that Paul Hudak, John Hughes, Phil Wadler and I have been
working on a paper called
A History of Haskell: being lazy with class
which will appear at this year's ACM SIGPLAN History of Programming Languages
Conference (HOPL-III) San Diego, California, June 9-10, 200
http://www.mail-archive.com/haskell@haskell.org/msg18863.html
(It was Simon Marlow actually, but we are joined at the hip so it hardly
matters)
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Reymont
| Sent: 25 January 2007 09:01
| To: Simon Mar
Where are SPJs disclosed comments from Brent Fulgham?
On Jan 25, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Forwarding on behalf of Andrzej Jaworski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Original Message
From: Andrzej Jaworski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dear fellows,
It is ironic that just after SPJ di
Forwarding on behalf of Andrzej Jaworski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Original Message
From: Andrzej Jaworski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dear fellows,
It is ironic that just after SPJ disclosed Comments from Brent Fulgham on
Haskell and the shootout the situation has radically changed for th
13 matches
Mail list logo
