this?
Bob
--
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
End of Haskell Digest, Vol 38, Issue 6
**
--
Chad Scherrer
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana&q
quot; == ["bb","c"]
--
tokens :: (Word8 -> Bool) -> ByteString -> [ByteString]
tokens f = List.filter (not.null) . splitWith f
Duncan
Ok, I'll just do it that way. Thanks!
--
Chad Scherrer
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana" -- Grouch
8> :t tokens
:1:0: Not in scope: `tokens'
Any idea where it went?
Thanks,
--
Chad Scherrer
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana" -- Groucho Marx
__
ad
On 6/29/06, Robby Findler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just out of curiosity, did you try "wc -l"?RobbyOn Jun 29, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Chad Scherrer wrote:> I have a bunch of data files where each line represents a data> point. It's nice to be able to quickly tell how many data
xecution time) being much shorter. Thanks, Don!
-- Chad Scherrer"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana" -- Groucho Marx
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
Thanks, Bulat. I'm looking forward to trying it out this weekend.
Is there any indication what fast IO approach might work its way into
the standard libraries? It would be nice for idiomatic Haskell to be
really fast by default, and I'd love to be able to show off the language
shootout implication
Cabal manual talks about a .cabal file, which doesn't exist here.
Does this follow some standard approach that I'm not familiar with? Where should I look to learn more?Thanks,-- Chad Scherrer"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana" -- Groucho Marx
_
oved to a distributed-memory system, I'm also not sure to what extent
increased latency is taken into account.
Thanks,
Chad Scherrer"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana" -- Groucho Marx
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
