Gwern Branwen gwern0 at gmail.com writes:
It must've been put in place in the past year or two; I've never made
any bones about using a pseudonym, and I had no trouble getting a
Hackage account back when it was starting up.
It may have helped that you appear to be using a pseudonym somewhat
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Niklas Brobergniklas.brob...@gmail.com wrote:
Alright, let's set an actual discussion period of 2 weeks for
ExplicitForall. If there is no opposition by then, we can add
ExplicitForall to the registered extensions in cabal as a first step.
Slightly more than
According to http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/Status,
ticket #99 was rejected, but the tickets own page,
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/ticket/99, says
probably yes. Which is it?
I was about to propose this myself, but decided to check the trac just
in case it had
On 1/10/07, Malcolm Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samuel Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I just leave it hanging and rely on the garbage collector to
close it in the fullness of time?
Actually, hGetContents closes the handle when it gets an EOF.
If it never does get EOF (because
On 1/4/07, Norman Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a misunderstanding here: readFile in itself is not the
solution. readFile is defined thus:
readFile name= openFile name ReadMode = hGetContents
and the original code was this:
load fn = do handle -
On 12/21/06, Axel Jantsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a function with type
f :: Int - Int - Int - Int - Int - NRup - NRdown
and I want to make sure it is evaluated only once for the same set of
arguments but I observe that it is always evaluated several times.
Maybe you want to memoize
On 12/10/06, Donald Bruce Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is DList, 0.1
I've cabalised, and packed up a small difference lists module. In case
you've not used them, they are a Haskell idiom for implementing O(1)
append and snoc, using functions to represent lists.
Are they in Monoid?
I've written a (partial) Z-machine interpreter in Haskell. It is
missing lots of stuff, but I got it to the point where it doesn't
cause actual pain to play with it ;-). It uses gtk2hs for the
interface, though other interfaces could be implemented without
actually changing the interpreter
On 12/9/06, Neil Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Samuel,
For future releases can you put up a little description of what a Z
Machine is in the email?
Hmm. That would probably be a good idea ;-). But I don't see why I
can't do that now, too. Except I actually want to describe the
Simon Peyton-Jones simonpj at microsoft.com writes:
| So, my hypothesis is that the inliner doesn't recognise that
| ``if (x = 0) then ...'' is effectively a case analysis on x, and thus
the
| argument discount is not fired. So we need to figure out how to
extend
| this criterion for
On 07/06/05, Simon Peyton-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Redirecting to GHC users]
I'm afraid I never got around to implementing splices in types, I'm
afraid. Interestingly, you are the first person who's asked for them.
That is only because everyone else was too lazy to bother asking.
On 06/06/05, Gracjan Polak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: is there any way to see what is holding my source list? I did
try to guess, but without results as of now:(
How do I debug and/or reason about such situation?
I heard that NHC has excellent heap profiling support, maybe it would
On 30/05/05, Shae Matijs Erisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samuel Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anybody know anything about this?
I think anything in fptools is BSD3 licensed, but I'm not sure if that's true.
I didn't know that was in fptools. I'll have to check that out again sometime
On 30/05/05, Isaac Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samuel Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(snip)
I think we might actually be suffering from the invented here
syndrome, namely because we got early exposure to darcs and many of us
got hooked.
I kinda disagree here. Haskell people
I was messing around with some pretty printing stuff in Pugs, and I
got tired of Text.PrettyPrint.HughesPJ, and wound up wanting to use
PPrint. But I don't see any license anywhere for it, so I'm naturally
a bit hessitant to stick it in the Pugs svn tree...
Anybody know anything about this?
--
On 26/05/05, Donald Bruce Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lambdabot was written by Andrew Bromage, and is now a community
project. lambdabot 3.0 would not have been possible without the help of
the #haskell irc community -- this release features more than 450
patches from 14 contributors.
On 26/05/05, Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/25/05, Samuel Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing is, Haskell people tend to want to use Darcs for their
Haskell stuff, and I don't think there are sites like sourceforge
supporting it yet...
I tried to address this in my
On 26/05/05, Sven Panne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samuel Bronson wrote:
The thing is, Haskell people tend to want to use Darcs for their
Haskell stuff, and I don't think there are sites like sourceforge
supporting it yet...
So my question is (probably once again): Why can 100.000 projects
Whoops, I sent this to just brian by mistake.
On 21/05/05, Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/13/05, Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, why not form HaskellForge and thereby form powerful Haskell
alliance, ie. common site which can host many/most present Haskell
projects offering
On 15/05/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taking this to an illogcial extreme, why don't we allow pointer arithmetic
in Haskell, but require people to import Prelude.C first, so that people
who enjoy playing with fire can do it? After all, we use it under the
covers...
Isn't
This turns out to have been a duplicate of [1199529] ghc --make panic
on fptools/ghc/compiler/Lexer.hs
___
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
I sent a couple of bug reports to the glasgow-haskell-bugs list, and
I'm wondering why nobody seems to have responded yet. Should I have
used the sourceforge bug tracker? Are they maybe just hard? Am I just
being unreasonably impatient?
-- Thanks, Sam
On 12/05/05, Greg Buchholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernard Pope wrote:
Perhaps this section of the report might help:
From Section 4.3.2 Instance Declarations in the Haskell Report:
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/decls.html#instance-decls
If no binding is given for some
On 12/05/05, Greg Buchholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samuel Bronson wrote:
After thinking about it for a while, I'm positive it would be a LOT of
work to get that to work in general, if it is even possible. Even
getting it to work in only specific, limited cases (such as within a
module
On 12/05/05, Greg Buchholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samuel Bronson wrote:
The former may not be hard, but the latter would require functions
with typeclass constraints on their types to be annotated in the
interface file with what typeclass methods they called. Does that
sound hard yet
Someone in #Haskell mentioned a problem they were having with GHC 6.4 and
mutually recursive modules. I'd never tried them, so I tried the simplest
thing I could think of and tried doing it a few ways, and these are my
findings.
I've attached all the relevant files and a tarball for maximum
It looks like TH has issues with mutually recursive modules. Now I
could understand this if I was actually trying to call functions in
modules imported with {-# SOURCE #-} from TH, but I'm not. What is
going on here? I am getting sick of seeing expectJust
upsweep_mod:old_linkable.
% ghc --make
On 5/9/05, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06 May 2005 18:33, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On 5/6/05, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(d) I hoped that something like grafting would provide a more
general solution.
Grafting sounds like a very nice solution just from
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/network/Network.So
cket.html#v%3Ainet_addr
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/network/Network.So
cket.html#v%3Ainet_ntoa
What is with this wrapping? Sorry to cross-post this, but I couldn't
figure out what to cut
On 5/5/05, S. Alexander Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Maybe something like
from Text.HaXML.XML import (Types, Escape, Pretty)
would be nice.
The problem with this one is that you need a way to express all the
other stuff in import
On 5/6/05, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(d) I hoped that something like grafting would provide a more
general solution.
Grafting sounds like a very nice solution just from the name, but I
don't recall hearing of it before. Where can I read about it?
On 5/3/05, S. Alexander Jacobson alex at alexjacobson.com wrote:
Problem: We need a way to simplify module imports.
Problem details:
* Hierarchical module names are getting really long (including a
functional area, a package name, and a module name).
* People typically import multiple
32 matches
Mail list logo
