On 30/05/05, Isaac Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Samuel Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (snip)
> > I think we might actually be suffering from the "invented here"
> > syndrome, namely because we got early exposure to darcs and many of us
> > got hooked.
>
> I kinda disagree here. Ha
Samuel Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
(snip)
> I think we might actually be suffering from the "invented here"
> syndrome, namely because we got early exposure to darcs and many of us
> got hooked.
I kinda disagree here. Haskell people were not using sourceforge way
before we had Darcs :)
Marnix Klooster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> One can start with just storing the darcs repository (-ies) for a
> project on SF, and export it through SF's web space. You could also run
> darcs.cgi there, for just viewing patches. And you can easily put your
> own darcs binary on an SF server, so
On 26/05/05, Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Samuel Bronson wrote:
> > The thing is, Haskell people tend to want to use Darcs for their
> > Haskell stuff, and I don't think there are sites like sourceforge
> > supporting it yet...
>
> So my question is (probably once again): Why can >100.0
On 26/05/05, Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/25/05, Samuel Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The thing is, Haskell people tend to want to use Darcs for their
> > Haskell stuff, and I don't think there are sites like sourceforge
> > supporting it yet...
>
> I tried to address thi
On 5/25/05, Samuel Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21/05/05, Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/13/05, Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If we take a look on new HCAR, we can see that many Haskell projects are
> > > scattered all around, so it would be nice to have them on
Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So my question is (probably once again): Why can >100.000 projects
> live with SF and not the Haskell community? Although CVS is not my
> favourite version control system, I'd happily use it if I get the
> rest of SF for free then.
For Hackage, we probably
TECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sven Panne
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 13:25
> To: Samuel Bronson
> Cc: haskell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Haskell] HaskellForge
>
> Samuel Bronson wrot
Samuel Bronson wrote:
The thing is, Haskell people tend to want to use Darcs for their
Haskell stuff, and I don't think there are sites like sourceforge
supporting it yet...
So my question is (probably once again): Why can >100.000 projects
live with SF and not the Haskell community? Although C
Whoops, I sent this to just brian by mistake.
On 21/05/05, Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/13/05, Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, why not form HaskellForge and thereby form powerful Haskell
> > alliance, ie. common site which can host many/most present Haskell
> > projects of
On 5/13/05, Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, why not form HaskellForge and thereby form powerful Haskell
> alliance, ie. common site which can host many/most present Haskell
> projects offering appropriate web & other (eg. darcs) services?
>
> If we take a look on new HCAR, we can see that m
On 5/21/05, Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lemmih wrote:
> > On 5/21/05, Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>I had a look at RubyForge, and it looks very much like a modified GForge
> >>(http://gforge.org/). Might this be an option for HaskellForge, too?
> >
> > Someone would have to
Lemmih wrote:
On 5/21/05, Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had a look at RubyForge, and it looks very much like a modified GForge
(http://gforge.org/). Might this be an option for HaskellForge, too?
Someone would have to hack support for Darcs and HaskellDB in PHP and
that someone will
On 5/21/05, Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lemmih wrote:
> > I'm currently working on Hackage[1] plus its integration with Cabal,
> > and extending it to include SourceForge-like features would definitely
> > be desirable. It is, however, a one-man project so don't hold your
> > breath.
>
Lemmih wrote:
I'm currently working on Hackage[1] plus its integration with Cabal,
and extending it to include SourceForge-like features would definitely
be desirable. It is, however, a one-man project so don't hold your
breath.
I had a look at RubyForge, and it looks very much like a modified
On 5/17/05, Lemmih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/13/05, Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear Haskellers,
> >
> > I'd like to suggest one idea which is going on in my mind for quite some
> > time...
> >
> > Recently the project where I am offering some help (gtk2hs) had to move
> > part of i
On 5/13/05, Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Haskellers,
>
> I'd like to suggest one idea which is going on in my mind for quite some
> time...
>
> Recently the project where I am offering some help (gtk2hs) had to move
> part of its web site from SourceForge to haskell.org since SF site ha
Dear Haskellers,
I'd like to suggest one idea which is going on in my mind for quite some
time...
Recently the project where I am offering some help (gtk2hs) had to move
part of its web site from SourceForge to haskell.org since SF site has
some limits which we were not able to overcome.
So, why
18 matches
Mail list logo
