Re: No more additions to the FFI API...

2000-03-29 Thread Sven Panne
Fergus Henderson wrote: > Well, I certainly understand that not everyone is interested in > reading all of the details in this FFI thread. But on the other > hand, I don't think we should create a new mailing list for every > new thread that generates a lot of discussion. [...] It's already too

Re: No more additions to the FFI API...

2000-03-29 Thread Fergus Henderson
On 28-Mar-2000, Andy Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't mean to be rude chaps, but is there any way you can > have this conversation without flooding haskell.org? > > How about a mailing list, on haskell.org, for FFI issues? Well, I certainly understand that not everyone is interested in

Re: No more additions to the FFI API...

2000-03-29 Thread Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
Andy Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > Don't mean to be rude chaps, but is there any way you can > have this conversation without flooding haskell.org? > > How about a mailing list, on haskell.org, for FFI issues? I am sorry if you find that topic boring, but we already had tons of email in a s

No more additions to the FFI API...

2000-03-28 Thread Andy Gill
Fergus Henderson wrote: > > On 28-Mar-2000, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:37:24 +1000, Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Don't mean to be rude chaps, but is there any way you can have this conversation without flooding haskell.org? How about a