| going to stop gtk+hs because of this. So it seems we are all
| waiting for the critical user mass that makes our own beloved
| GUI library (binding) the standard GUI library. For the sake
| of Haskell, we can only hope that this will actually happen
| one day. A sad side-effects of this is
--- Simon Peyton-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| going to stop gtk+hs because of this. So it seems
we are all
| waiting for the critical user mass that makes our
own beloved
| GUI library (binding) the standard GUI library.
For the sake
| of Haskell, we can only hope that this will
Axel Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
when I first asked Manuel (author of gtk+hs) if it is ok to make my Gtk
binding public, he said something along the lines of I can't keep you
from making it public and I am not going to stop gtk+hs because of
this.
Just for the record, what I said is that
Hi folks,
when I first asked Manuel (author of gtk+hs) if it is ok to make my Gtk
binding public, he said something along the lines of I can't keep you
from making it public and I am not going to stop gtk+hs because of
this. So it seems we are all waiting for the critical user mass that
makes our
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:12:55 +
Axel Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two answers: Me too. and I am.. But how can we proceed from here?
I think we should all be more flexible and communicate more openly
and earlier. The latter probably would have avoided that I went off
and did my own
--- Axel Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Krasimir,
In the last two years I have implemented a binding
of Gtk Version 2 to
Haskell. I read the first paper about Object I/O of
Peter Achten and Simon
PJ which was published in IFL'00. I wondered if I
could supply a layer
like that of
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:12:51 +0100
Nick Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(this is an argument for the Haskell
mailing list)
I didn't notice that this discussion wasn't already on the haskell
mailing list, and tought that it was on gtk2hs, in case someone is
wondering :)
Vincenzo
