On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 01:35:45 +0100, Jorge Adriano Aires
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure which part is not clear... I'll just try to explain each of them.
> Lets say I'm implementing a generators for Graphs.
>
> > > Also, even when I'm implementing a generator, I want to see how it is
> > > wo
Hi Tom,
You might try building ghc using darwinports
(darwinports.opendarwin.org).
It works under both Jaguar and Panther. I maintain the port, and would
be
interested in your experience on 10.4-beta. (The darwinports version
doesn't
use /Library/Frameworks, instead it keeps everything in a uni
> > Hello all,
> > When using Quickcheck, is there some way to extract generated data values
> > to the IO Monad?
> >
> > I know I can collect and print information about test cases, but that's
> > not enough. Data may be pretty complex, and there may be no parsers for
> > it. If a test suddenly g
Chung-chieh,
Well, I tried what you suggested, and it seems to work. Unfortunately,
it's not very useful. The point of creating MonadPCont, was, like
MonadCont or MonadState, to automatically provide features to a monad
built from a transformer, without having to redefine them. Since ContT
i
--- Tomasz Zielonka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 08:47:51AM -0700, Ron de
> Bruijn wrote:
> > I heard of the +RTS option. I used:
> > ghci SomeModule.hs -someoptions +RTS -K150,
> but
> > this doesn't seem to have any effect.
>
> Try +RTS -K150M.
> -K150 means 15
Hi,
I've been attempting to use GHC on a beta copy of Mac OS X 10.4,
I've been attmepting to use the panther version of the install
package, but have hit a problem with tinkering with it - I get the
following error when I attempt to run ghc:
Verenia:~/Documents/Development/XBridgeAI tatd100$ ghc
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 08:47:51AM -0700, Ron de Bruijn wrote:
> I heard of the +RTS option. I used:
> ghci SomeModule.hs -someoptions +RTS -K150, but
> this doesn't seem to have any effect.
Try +RTS -K150M.
-K150 means 150 bytes.
Best regards,
Tom
--
.signature: Too many levels of
I have an expression that gives a stack overflow in
ghci (official Debian unstable CVS version)) when I
evaluate it. The expression doesn't use more than
150MB of memory (I have more). How can I make sure the
stack overflow doesn't happen?
There are no strictness flags in my program. But I use
DDa
Jorge Adriano Aires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
> When using Quickcheck, is there some way to extract generated data values to
> the IO Monad?
>
> I know I can collect and print information about test cases, but that's not
> enough. Data may be pretty complex, and there may be no p
>do e <- isEmptyChan ch -- is the channel empty?
> case e of
>True -> processFifo
>False-> readChan ch >>= highPriorityOrPush
>Now there is danger of blocking on the readChan.
Erm, but it does not matter if the readChan blocks... This is
specifically for the case where there is multiple
On 01.09 13:09, Jan-Willem Maessen - Sun Labs East wrote:
> I was, however, curious what use you had in mind where writes were
> racing, but where you nonetheless wanted to perform blind non-blocking
> reads. Such situations are generally fraught with peril. In this
> case, the peril is starva
On 01.09 18:30, MR K P SCHUPKE wrote:
> while channel not empty
> read next event
> if event high priority process now
> else queue event in FIFO
> process first event in FIFO
That suffers from the same problem as I described.
do e <- isEmptyC
12 matches
Mail list logo
