Has anyone written a pure haskell xslt interpreter? If not, how
difficult would it be to do so?
A master student of mine implemented XSLT in Haskell a couple of
years ago.
I've uploaded his thesis on
http://www.cs.uu.nl/~johanj/MSc/danny.pdf
If you're interested in the code, mail me.
Hi,
Is it possible to ask GHC or other Haskell compiler to generate a
Haskell source file just after the processing of layout? I.e., I would
like to see this:
main = do
a - some_function
Transformed into this:
main = do {a - some_function;
I thought that would be usefull
Is there a way to use haskell as scripting language in
a) your own project?
b) other projects such as vim (beeing written in C)?
At the moment I'm interested, I don't have any real project..
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
John Meacham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there are actually several ways to implement IO. There is a paper
about it somewhere that explores various methods, but I can't seem
to find it, does anyone know which one i am thinking of? I know it
at least explores the state and continuation versions
For scenario (a) you can use hs-plugins and ghc
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/hs-plugins/
With hs-plugins you can get an eval command, or you can dynamically
load Haskell modules (from source or pre-compiled .o files).
GHC (= 6.5) has an API that you can access from Haskell programs:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 09:42:10AM +0100, Ketil Malde wrote:
Not sure how relevant this is, but I see there is a recently released
hash library here that might be a candidate for FFIing?
https://sourceforge.net/projects/goog-sparsehash/
| An extremely memory-efficient hash_map
On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:42 AM, Ketil Malde wrote:
Not sure how relevant this is, but I see there is a recently released
hash library here that might be a candidate for FFIing?
https://sourceforge.net/projects/goog-sparsehash/
The real issue isn't the algorithms involved; I saw the best
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 04:58:34PM +0100, Johan Bockgård wrote:
John Meacham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there are actually several ways to implement IO. There is a paper
about it somewhere that explores various methods, but I can't seem
to find it, does anyone know which one i am thinking
jupdike:
For scenario (a) you can use hs-plugins and ghc
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/hs-plugins/
With hs-plugins you can get an eval command, or you can dynamically
load Haskell modules (from source or pre-compiled .o files).
GHC (= 6.5) has an API that you can access from Haskell
I'll try to occasionally post an announcement of the the status of
Haskell'[1], the next Haskell standard, so that you can all be aware of
my thinking, and our current place in the timeline.
There is a list of proposals and a strawman categorization of them
on the wiki[2]. The categorization
vim7 has introduced omni-completion... So I'm interested wether there
are any projects which support any kind of completion.?
I've read the thread about Eclipse IDE haskell plugin.
Would you recommend picking up code from a haskell compiler and adapt
it for this purpose?
I'm interested but
Niklas Broberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote::
On 2/10/06, Ross Paterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 05:20:47PM +0100, Niklas Broberg wrote:
- when looking at the definition of MonadWriter the Monoid constraint
is not strictly necessary, and none of the other mtl monads have
12 matches
Mail list logo
